JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Horizontal bone augmentation using a mixture of cortico-cancellous allograft and bovine bone mineral with a collagen membrane: a retrospective study
Aims: The study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of bone augmentation with a mixture of cortico-cancellous allograft and xenograft with a collagen membrane in horizontal augmentation of knife-edge alveolar crests. Material and
Methods: Patients with a ridge thickness of less than 4 mm by preoperative tomography were included in the study. Twelve patients (10 Female, 2 Male) were treated with a mixture of Cortico-Cancellous Allograft and Bovine Bone Mineral with a collagen membrane.
Results: Thirty-nine implants were placed in twelve patients. The initial bone thickness is between 1 and 4 cm (mean: 3±0.89440). Nine months after horizontal augmentation, bone thickness varies between 4.53 and 9.15 cm (mean: 4.62±1.16782). The gained bone thickness varies between 1.27 and 7.72 cm (mean 3.66±1.21041).
Conclusion: Augmentation of alveolar bones knife-edge crestal margins with a mixture of Cortico-Cancellous Allograft and Bovine Bone Mineral with a collagen membrane is simple, successful, and feasible.


1. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentationprocedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants2009; 24: 237-59.
2. Buser D, Dula K, Hess D, et al. Localized ridge augmentation withautografts and barrier membranes. Periodontology 2000; 19: 151-63.
3. Sheikh Z, Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, et al. Biodegradable materials forbone repair and tissue engineering applications. Materials 2015;8: 5744-94.
4. Khojasteh A, Behnia H, Soleymani Shayesteh Y, et al. Localizedbone augmentation with cortical bone blocks tented over differentparticulate bone substitutes: a retrospective study. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 6.
5. Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Hayacibara R, et al. Healing ofextraction sockets and surgically produced-augmented and non-augmented-defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental studyin the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 435-40.
6. Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of humanextraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss®. Clin Oral Implants Res2003;14: 137-43.
7. Jensen SS, Broggini N, Hjørting-Hansen E, et al. Bone healingand graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and β-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric studyin the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17:237-43.
8. Lee IK, Lim HC, Lee JS, et al. Layered approach with autogenousbone and bone substitute for ridge augmentation on implantdehiscence defects in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 622-8.
9. Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL. Horizontal ridge augmentationwith a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bonewith or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: aprospective case series in 22 patients. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants 2011; 26: 2.
10. Serrano CA, Castellanos P, Botticelli D. Use of combinationof allografts and xenografts for alveolar ridge preservationprocedures: a clinical and histological case series. Implant Dent2018; 27: 467-73.
11. Galindo-Moreno P, Moreno-Riestra I, Ávila G, et al.Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone andcomposite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation.Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 122-8.
12. Poulias E, Greenwell H, Hill M, et al. Ridge preservationcomparing socket allograft alone to socket allograft plus facialoverlay xenograft: a clinical and histologic study in humans. JPeriodontol 2013; 84: 1567-75.
13. Mordenfeld A, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T, et al. A randomizedand controlled clinical trial of two different compositions ofdeproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone used for lateralridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 310-20.
14. Elnayef B, Porta C, Del Amo FS-L, et al. The fate of lateral ridgeaugmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants 2018; 33: 3.
15. Hashemipoor M, Asghari N, Mohammadi M, et al. Radiologicaland histological evaluation of horizontal ridge augmentationusing corticocancellous freeze-dried bone allograft with andwithout autogenous bone: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clin Implant Dent Related Res 2020; 22: 582-92.
16. Song YW, Jung HJ, An YZ, et al. Addition of autogenous bonechips to deproteinized bovine bone mineral does not haveadditional benefit in lateral ridge augmentation—A preclinical invivo experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021; 32: 1105-14.
17. Kloss FR, Offermanns V, Kloss-Brandstätter A. Comparisonof allogeneic and autogenous bone grafts for augmentation ofalveolar ridge defects—A 12-month retrospective radiographicevaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 1163-75.
18. Wang H-L, Boyapati L. “PASS” principles for predictable boneregeneration. Implant Dent 2006;15: 8-17.
19. Shah R, Gowda TM, Thomas R, et al. Biological activation of bonegrafts using injectable platelet-rich fibrin. J Prosth Dent 2019; 121:391-3.
20. Yuan S, Li Q, Chen K, Mu Z et al. Ridge preservation applying anovel hydrogel for early angiogenesis and osteogenesis evaluation:an experimental study in canine. J Biol Eng 2021;15:19.
21. Mu Z, Chen K, Yuan S, et al. Gelatin nanoparticleinjectableplatelet-rich fibrin double network hydrogels with localadaptability and bioactivity for enhanced osteogenesis. AdvHealthc Mater 2020;9:e1901469.
22. Irdem HO, Dolanmaz D, Esen A, et al. Evaluation of theeffectiveness of liquid platelet-rich fibrin and deproteinizedbovine bone mineral mixture on newly formed bone in maxillarysinus augmentation: a split-mouth, histomorphometric study.Niger J Clin Pract 2021; 24: 1366-72.
23. Luca De S, Tunkel MJ, Fincato MA, et. al. The vestibular shiftedflap design for vertical bone augmentation in the maxilla: casereport and technical notes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent2021; 41: 367-73.
24. Soldatos NK, Stylianou P, Koidou VP, et al. Limitations andoptions using resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes forsuccessful guided bone regeneration. Quintessence International2017; 48: 2.
Volume 6, Issue 2, 2023
Page : 268-272
_Footer