JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Evaluation of factors related to taste function in type 2 diabetics
Aims: The sense is an important driver of diet choice, which can lead to the development of chronic diseases such as diabetes. Although factors affecting differences in taste function between individuals have been evaluated in healthy individuals, there are limited studies investigating them in patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of the present study was to analyse the factors affecting taste function in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Material and
Methods: Sixty-one participants with a history of type 2 diabetes lasting at least one year and aged 19 to 75 years were enrolled. The taste function was tested using impregnated filter paper strips.
Results: The mean taste strip scores of the participants for sweet, salty, bitter, sour, and overall were 2.38±0.88, 1.91±0.92, 2.28±0.76, 2.18±1.01, 8.7±1.81, respectively. Age was significantly associated with the taste score for salty (r= -0.225 p= 0.041) and sour (r= -0.252 p= 0.040). It was determined that there was no effect of other confounders (gender, body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin and duration of diabetes), except age, on the overall taste score in participants.
Conclusion: Future studies with a larger number of patients may help better investigate the factors affecting taste function in type 2 diabetics.


1. Perreault L, Skyler JS, Rosenstock J. Novel therapies with precisionmechanisms for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2021;17: 364-77.
2. Unwin, N, Whiting, D, Guariguata, L. Diabetes Atlas. 5th ed.Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2012.
3. Gutierrez R, Simon SA. Chemosensory processing in the taste-reward pathway. Flavour Fragr J 2011; 26: 231-8.
4. Kitamura A, Torii K, Uneyama H, Niijima A. Role played by afferentsignals from olfactory, gustatory and gastrointestinal sensors inregulation of autonomic nerve activity. Biol Pharm Bull 2010; 33:1778-82.
5. Rolls ET. Smell, taste, texture, and temperature multimodalrepresentations in the brain, and their relevance to the control ofappetite. Nutr Rev 2004; 62: 193-204.
6. Bloomfeld RS, Graham BG, Schiffman SS, Killenberg PG.Alterations of chemosensory function in end-stage liver disease.Physiol Behav 1999; 66: 203-7.
7. Barragán R, Coltell O, Portolés O, et al. Bitter, sweet, salty, sour andumami taste perception decreases with age: Sex-specific analysis,modulation by genetic variants and taste-preference associations in18 to 80 year-old subjects. Nutrients 2018; 10: 1539.
8. Imoscopi A, Inelmen EM, Sergi G, Miotto F, Manzato E. Taste lossin the elderly: epidemiology, causes and consequences. Aging ClinExp Res 2012; 24: 570-9.
9. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometricstandardization reference manual. 1st ed. Champaign - IL: HumanKinetics Books; 1988. Anthoropometric Standardization ReferenceManual. Human Kinetics Books; 1998
10. Mueller C, Kallert S, Renner B, et al. Quantitative assessment ofgustatory function in a clinical context using impregnated" tastestrips". Rhinology 2003; 41: 2-6.
11. Mojet J, Christ-Hazelhof E, Heidema J. Taste perception with age:generic or specific losses in threshold sensitivity to the five basictastes? Chem Senses 2001; 26: 845-60.
12. Pugnaloni S, Alia S, Mancini M, et al. A study on the relationshipbetween type 2 diabetes and taste function in patients with goodglycemic control. Nutrients 2020; 12: 1112.
13. Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Brämerson A, et al. “Taste Strips”-arapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based onimpregnated filter papers. J Neurol 2009; 256: 242-8.
14. Welge-Lüssen A, Dörig P, Wolfensberger M, Krone F, Hummel T.A study about the frequency of taste disorders. J Neurol 2011; 258:386-92.
15. Vignini A, Borroni F, Sabbatinelli J, et al. General decrease oftaste sensitivity is related to increase of BMI: A simple method tomonitor eating behavior. Dis Markers 2019; 2019: 1-8.
16. Yu JH, Shin MS, Lee JR, et al. Decreased sucrose preference inpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;104: 214-9.
17. Gondivkar SM, Indurkar A, Degwekar S, Bhowate R. Evaluation ofgustatory function in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. OralSurg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: 876-80.
18. Vidanage D, Prathapan S, Wasalathanthri S, Hettiarachchi P.Factors associated with sweet taste sensitivity in patients with type2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). J Ruhunu Clin Soc 2020; 25: 25-9.
19. Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Cockroft JE. Genetic sensitivityto 6-n-propylthiouracil has no influence on dietary patterns, bodymass indexes, or plasma lipid profiles of women. J Am Diet Assoc2007; 107: 1340-8.
20. Salbe AD, DelParigi A, Pratley RE, Drewnowski A, Tataranni PA.Taste preferences and body weight changes in an obesity-pronepopulation. Am J Clin Nutr 2004; 79: 372-8.
21. Tucker RM, Kaiser KA, Parman MA, George BJ, Allison DB, MattesRD. Comparisons of fatty acid taste detection thresholds in peoplewho are lean vs. overweight or obese: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one 2017; 12: e0169583.
22. Stewart JE, Feinle-Bisset C, Golding M, Delahunty C, Clifton PM,Keast RS. Oral sensitivity to fatty acids, food consumption and BMIin human subjects. Br J Nutr 2010; 104: 145-52.
23. Proserpio C, Laureati M, Bertoli S, Battezzati A, Pagliarini E.Determinants of obesity in Italian adults: the role of taste sensitivity,food liking, and food neophobia. Chem Senses 2016; 41: 169-76.
24. Hardikar S, Höchenberger R, Villringer A, Ohla K. Highersensitivity to sweet and salty taste in obese compared to leanindividuals. Appetite 2017; 111: 158-65.
25. Le Floch JP, Le Lievre G, Sadoun J, Perlemuter L, Peynegre R,Hazard J. Taste impairment and related factors in type I diabetesmellitus. Diabetes care. 1989; 12: 173-8.
26. Bustos-Saldaña R, Alfaro-Rodríguez M, de la Luz Solís-Ruiz M,Trujillo-Hernández B, Pacheco-Carrasco M, Vázquez-JiménezC. Taste sensitivity diminution in hyperglycemic type 2 diabeticspatients. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2009; 47: 483-8.
27. Le Floch JP, Le Lièvre G, Labroue M, Paul M, Peynegre R,Perlemuter L. Smell dysfunction and related factors in diabeticpatients. Diabetes care 1993; 16: 934-7.
28. Yazla S, Özmen S, Kıyıcı S, Yıldız D, Haksever M, Gencay S.Evaluation of olfaction and taste function in type 2 diabetic patientswith and without peripheral neuropathy. Observational Study2018; 34: e2973.
29. Perros P, MacFarlane TW, Counsell C, Frier BM. Altered tastesensation in newly-diagnosed NIDDM. Diabetes care 1996; 19:768-70.
30. Chochinov RH, Ullyot GLE, Moorhouse JA. Sensory perceptionthresholds in patients with juvenile diabetes and their closerelatives. N Engl J Med 1972; 286: 1233-7.
31. Naka A, Riedl M, Luger A, Hummel T, Mueller CA. Clinicalsignificance of smell and taste disorders in patients with diabetesmellitus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267: 547-50.
32. Weinstock RS, Wright HN, Smith DU. Olfactory dysfunction indiabetes mellitus. Physiol Behav 1993; 53: 17-21.
33. Latha G, Chandrashekar D, Puranik N. Altered taste threshold inchronic Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol2018; 8: 569-74.
34. Khobragade R, Wakode S, Kale A. Duration of Diabetes Mellitusand Taste Threshold. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2012; 56: 42-7.
35. Epstein F, Schiffman S. Taste and smell in disease. N Engl J Med1983; 308: 1275-9.
36. Negrato CA, Tarzia O. Buccal alterations in diabetes mellitus.Diabetol Metab Syndr 2010; 2: 1-11.
37. Ohkoshi N, Shoji S. Reversible ageusia induced by losartan: a casereport. Eur J Neurol2002; 9: 315-21.
38. Schlienger R, Saxer M, Haefeli W. Reversible ageusia associatedwith losartan. Lancet 1996; 347: 471-2.
39. Lee AJ. Metformin in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.Pharmacotherapy 1996; 16: 327-51.
Volume 6, Issue 2, 2023
Page : 277-281
_Footer