JHSM
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

ISSN: Active
eISSN: 2636-8579
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Submit Manuscript

Index
Original Article
Current treatment approaches of newly graduated, intern dentists and dentists in doctoral and specialty training to teeth with excessive substance loss (cross-sectional study)
Abstract
Aims: New treatment options have been developed as alternative post-retaining restorations and crowns that preserve remaining tooth tissue in endodontically treated teeth with excessive substance loss. This study, current treatment approaches newly graduated, intern and doctoral or specialist dentists in teeth excessive coronal destruction were evaluated. Material and
Methods: This cross-sectional study, online questionnaire consisting of 22 questions, 3 parts was applied. First part consists of demographic information participants, second part consists of questions measuring awareness about preferred indirect restorations, last part consists of current treatment approaches newly graduated, intern and doctoral or specialist dentists. Total 234 voluntary participants questionnaires were evaluated. Obtained data were analyzed with IBM SPSS V23.
Results: In restoration of endodontically treated buccal mesial walls (least 2 mm thick) molars, participants all 3 groups preferred posterior adhesive indirect restorations according to their titles. Considering level of awareness, participants high group preferred posterior adhesive indirect restorations more in restorations endodontically treated buccal lingual walled molar teeth. Participants all 3 groups preferred use fiber under composite strengthen teeth in the restoration of teeth with excessive substance loss.
Conclusion: According to the results, it was determined that awareness and knowledge level of dentists who received specialty or doctoral training about new current treatments was higher than other newly graduated and intern dentists. It was observed that participants group with high level awareness mostly preferred posterior region indirect adhesive restorations such as endocrown and onlay.

Keywords : Doctoral student, dentistry student, endocrown, fiber, onlay

Download Article


1. Tosun S, Özsevik AS, Aydın U. Endodontik tedavili dişlerinrestorasyonu. Gaziantep Med J 2016; 22: 33-8.
2. Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Fracture strength and fracturepatterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.J Dent 2011; 39: 527-35.
3. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dentalcomposites. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13: 427-38.
4. Flury S, Hayoz S, Peutzfeldt A, Hüsler J, Lussi A. Depth of cureof resin composites: is the ISO 4049 method suitable for bulk fillmaterials? Dent Mater J 2012; 28: 521-8.
5. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of threecomposite resins for the inlay/onlay technique. J Prosthet Dent1991; 66: 322-4.
6. Fildisi MA, Eliguzeloglu ED. The effect of fiber insertion onfracture strength and fracture modes in endocrown and overlayrestorations. Microsc Res Tech 2022; 85: 1799-807.
7. Genovese K, Lamberti L, Pappalettere C. Finite element analysisof a new customized composite post system for endodonticallytreated teeth. J Biomech 2005; 38: 2375-89.
8. Magne P, Knezevic A. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resinoverlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treatedpremolars. Dent Mater J 2009; 25: 1264-8.
9. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizingthe monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7: 83-94.
10. Ereifej NS, Oweis YG, Altarawneh SK. Fracture of fiber-reinforcedcomposites analyzed via acoustic emission. Dent Mater J 2015; 34:417-24.
11. Belli S, Erdemir A, Yildirim C. Reinforcement effect ofpolyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of tworestoration techniques. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 136-42.
12. Hshad M, Dalkılıç E, Ozturk G, Dogruer I, Koray F. Influence ofdifferent restoration techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth: In vitro investigation. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 162-9.
13. Tunac A, Celik E, Yasa B. Two-year performance of CAD/CAMfabricated resin composite inlay restorations: a randomizedcontrolled clinical trial. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31: 627-38.
14. Van Dijken J. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 yearfollow-up. J Dent 2000; 28: 299-306.
15. Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of span length offlexural testing on properties of short fiber reinforced composite.J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012; 23: 325-8.
16. Martins RC, Seijo MOS, Ferreira EF, Paiva SM, Ribeiro SobrinhoAP. Dental students' perceptions about the endodontic treatmentsperformed using NiTi rotary instruments and hand stainless steelfiles. Braz Dent J 2012; 23: 729-36.
17. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, Giesinger JM, Dumfahrt H.Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorationsin posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 395-402.
18. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffnessas a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod1989; 15: 512-6.
19. Biacchi G, Basting R. Comparison of fracture strength ofendocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns.Oper Dent 2012; 37: 130-6.
20. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS et al. Impact of the quality ofcoronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings onsuccess of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2011; 37: 895-902.
21. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A. 3D-Finite element analysis of molarsrestored with endocrowns and posts during masticatorysimulation. Dent Mater 2013; 29: e309-e17.
22. Sedrez-Porto JA, da Rosa WLdO, da Silva AF, Münchow EA,Pereira-Cenci T. Endocrown restorations: A systematic reviewand meta-analysis. J Dent 2016; 52: 8-14.
23. Roggendorf MJ, Kunzi B, Ebert J, Roggendorf HC, FrankenbergerR, Reich SM. Seven-year clinical performance of CEREC-2 all-ceramic CAD/CAM restorations placed within deeply destroyedteeth. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 1413-24.
24. Bindl A, Richter B, Mörmann WH. Survival of ceramic computer-aided design/manufacturing crowns bonded to preparations withreduced macroretention geometry. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18:219-24
25. Faria ACL, Rodrigues RCS, de Almeida Antunes RP, de MattosMdGC, Ribeiro RF. Endodontically treated teeth: characteristicsand considerations to restore them. J Prosthodont 2011; 55: 69-74.
26. Wendt JS, Harris BM, Hunt TE. Resistance to cusp fracture inendodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater J 1987; 3: 232-5.
Article available in :
Volume 6, Issue 2, 2023
Page : 307-314
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1228414
Article Information
Received : 02 Oca 2023
Accepted : 25 Oca 2023
Published : 27 Mar 2023
Corresponding Author :

Bike Altan: Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey

[email protected]
Citation : Altan B, Fildişi MA, Çınar Ş, Aydemir E, Özkan D. Current treatment approaches of newly graduated, intern dentists and dentists in doctoral and specialty training to teeth with excessive substance loss (cross-sectional study). J Health Sci Med 2023; 6(2): 307-314.

Read: 159
Cited: 0
Download : 148
_Footer