JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Comparison of diagnostic methods in onychomycosis
Aims: Onychomycosis is a chronic fungal infection of the nail bed, plate, or matrix. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity of three diagnostic methods in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Material and
Methods: This study included 39 patients with a clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis of the toenails, who presented to Medipol Mega University Hospital between May 2019 and August 2022. Using the nail samples taken from the patients, the results of the direct microscopic examination with standard potassium hydroxide (KOH), histopathological examination performed with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining, and fungal agents that grew in fungal culture were noted.
Results: Eleven (28.2%) patients were female, and 28 (71.8%) were male, with the mean age being 43.1±13.9 years. Of the patients, 53.8% had distal subungual onychomycosis and 46.2% had total subungual onychomycosis. The mean disease duration was 38.8±24.5 (12-120) months. Fungal infection was detected on direct microscopic examination with standard KOH in 66.7% of the patients, culture growth in 38.5%, and PAS staining on histopathological examination in 71.8%, and the sensitivities of these methods were determined as 74.3%, 49.2%, and 80%, respectively, with the negative predictive values being 30.8%, 16.7%, and 36.4%, respectively.
Conclusion: Among the investigated methods, histopathological examination with PAS staining was found to have the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of onychomycosis.


1. Gupta AK, Stec N, Summerbell RC, et al. Onychomycosis: areview. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34: 1972-90.
2. Gupta AK, Versteeg SG, Shear NH. Onychomycosis in the 21stcentury: an update on diagnosis, epidemiology, and treatment. JCutan Med Surg 2017; 21: 525-39.
3. Maraki S, Mavromanolaki VE. Epidemiology of onychomycosisin Crete, Greece: a 12-year study. Mycoses 2016; 59: 798-802.
4. Leung AKC, Lam JM, Leong KF, et al. Onychomycosis: an updatedreview. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov 2020; 14: 32-45.
5. Lipner SR, Scher RK. Onychomycosis: clinical overview anddiagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 80: 835-51.
6. Pang SM, Pang JYY, Fook-Chong S, Tan AL. Tinea unguiumonychomycosis caused by dermatophytes: a ten-year (2005-2014)retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. SingaporeMed J 2018; 59: 524-7.
7. Summerbell RC, Gueidan C, Guarro J, et al. The proteanAcremonium. A. sclerotigenum/egyptiacum: revision, foodcontaminant, and human disease. Microorganisms 2018; 6: 88.
8. Bongomin F, Batac CR, Richardson MD, Denning DW. A reviewof onychomycosis due to Aspergillus species. Mycopathologia2018; 183: 485-93.
9. Subramanya SH, Subedi S, Metok Y, Kumar A, Prakash PY, NayakN. Distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis of the finger nailin a neonate: a rare case. BMC Pediatr 2019; 19: 168.
10. Ghannoum M, Mukherjee P, Isham N, Markinson B, Rosso JD,Leal L. Evvxamining the importance of laboratory and diagnostictesting when treating and diagnosing onychomycosis. Int JDermatol 2018; 57: 131-8.
11. Karaman BFO, Açıkalın A, Ünal İ, Aksungur VL. Diagnosticvalues of KOH examination, histological examination, andculture for onychomycosis: a latent class analysis. Int J Dermatol2019; 58: 319-24.
12. Murray P, Rosenthal K, Pfaller M (editors). In: Medicalmicrobiology. Eighth ed., Elsevier; 2015: 585-94.
13. Reisberger EM, Abels C, Landthaler M, Szeimies RM.Histopathological diagnosis of onychomycosis by periodic acid-Schiff-stained nail clippings. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148: 749-54.
14. Shemer A, Trau H, Davidovici B, Grunwald MH, Amichai B.Collection of fungi samples from nails: comparative study ofcurettage and drilling techniques. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol2008; 22: 182-5.
15. Fletcher CL, Hay JR, Smeeton NC. Onychomycosis: Thedevelopment of a clinical diagnostic aid for toenail disease: PartI. Establishing discriminating historical and clinical features. Br JDermatol 2004; 150: 701-5.
16. Daniel CR 3rd, Elewski BE. The diagnosis of nail fungus infectionrevisited. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 1162-4.
17. Borkowski P, Williams M, Holewinski J, Bakotic B. Onychomycosis:an analysis of 50 cases and a comparison of diagnostic techniques.J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001; 91: 351-5.
18. Shenoy MM, Teerthanath S, Karnaker VK, Girisha BS, KrishnaPrasad MS, Pinto J. Comparison of potassium hydroxide mountand mycological culture with histopathologic examination usingperiodic acid-Schiff staining of the nail clippings in the diagnosisof onychomycosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2008; 74:226-9.
19. Jeelani S, Ahmed QM, Lanker AM, Hassan I, Jeelani N, FaziliT. Histopathological examination of nail clippings using PASstaining (HPE-PAS): gold standard in diagnosis of onychomycosis.Mycoses 2015; 58: 27-32.
20. Weinberg JM, Koestenblatt EK, Tutrone WD, Tishler HR,Najarian L. Comparison of diagnostic methods in the evaluationof onychomycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 193-7.
21. Aydıngöz İE, Akkaya AD, Aker F, Adaleti R. Comparison ofmethods for the diagnosis of onychomycosis in a series of 50cases. Türkderm 2006; 40: 20-2.
22. Ceren E, Ekmekci TR, Sakız D, Köşlü A, Bayraktar B. Comparisonof the methods for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Türkderm2008; 42: 91-3.
23. Grover C, Reddy BSN, Chaturvedi KU. Onychomycosis and thediagnostic significance of nail biopsy. J Dermatol 2003; 30: 116-22.
24. Erkan F, Kaçar SD, Özuğuz P, Aşık G, Tokyol Ç, Karaca Ş.Comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of five differentdiagnostic methods in the evaluation of onychomycosis.Türkderm 2014; 48: 21-5.
25. Arca E, Saracli MA, Akar A, Yildiran ST, Kurumlu Z, Gur AR.Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. EurJ Dermatol 2004; 14: 52-5.
26. Wilsmann-Theis D, Sareika F, Bieber T, Schmid-WendtnerM-H, Wenzel J. New reasons for histopathological nail-clippingexamination in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. J Eur AcadDermatol Venereol 2011; 25: 235-7.
27. Hsiao Y-P, Lin H-S, Wu T-W, et al. A comparative study of KOHtest, PAS staining and fungal culture in diagnosis of onychomycosisin Taiwan. J Dermatol Sci 2007; 45: 138-40.
28. Yurtoğlu F, Yıldız L, Şentürk N, et al. Comparison of diagnosticmethods for onychomycosis: a controlled, prospective study. TurkJ Dermatol 2011; 5: 48-52.
29. Karimzadegan-Nia M, Mir-Amin-Mohammadi A, Bouzari N,Firooz A. Comparison of direct smear, culture and histology forthe diagnosis of onychomycosis. Australas J Dermatol 2007; 48:18-21.
30. Gianni C, Morelli V, Cerri A, et al. Usefulness of histologicalexamination for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Dermatology2001; 202: 283-8.
31. Gupta A. The incremental diagnostic yield of successive re-cultures in patients with a clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis. JAm Acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 129.
32. Hajar T, Fernández-Martínez R, Moreno-Coutiño G, VásquezDel Mercado E, Arenas R. Modified PAS stain: a new diagnosticmethod for onychomycosis. Rev Iberoam Micol 2016; 33: 34-7.
33. Jung MY, Shim JH, Lee JH, et al. Comparison of diagnosticmethods for onychomycosis, and proposal of a diagnosticalgorithm. Clin Exp Dermatol 2015; 40: 479-84.
Volume 6, Issue 2, 2023
Page : 353-358
_Footer