JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Assessing the effects of asthma attack simulation on cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning in nursing students: a randomized controlled study
Aims: Asthma is a global health problem. Nursing students, who play a key role in managing asthma attack, should be capable of recognising and responding to asthma symptoms. This research aimed to assess the repercussions of asthma attack simulation training on nursing students cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning domains.
Methods: A randomised controlled trial was used in this study. Fourth-year nursing students with no prior simulation training experience were recruited. This research randomly divided participants into two distinct groups: a simulation group, consisting of 53 members, and a control group, with 62 members. Each group received 100 hours of standard training, and only the simulation group received 210 hours of asthma attack simulation training instruction based on Bloom's taxonomy the following day. A knowledge questionnaire was used to evaluate nursing students' cognitive learning on asthma attacks right after theoretical training and three months afterwards. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination was used as a standardised evaluation instrument to evaluate students' psychomotor learning, and the emotional learning, empathy, motivation, self- efficacy, and anxiety levels of nursing students were assessed using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10 three months after their theoretical training.
Results: Asthma attack cognitive, psychomotor, and emotional learning of nursing students in the Simulation group improved after the intervention compared to the control group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Simulation-based training demonstrates potential efficacy in enhancing nursing students' cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning related to asthma attacks.


1. Asthma Diagnosis and Treatment Guide, 2020. Accessed February1, 2023. https://www.aid.org.tr/wpcontent/uploads/2020/12/astim-rehberi-2020.pdf.
2. Global Strategy for Asthma. Global Strategy for AsthmaManagement and Prevention, 2019.Accessed February 1, 2023.http://www.ginasthma.org. 2019.
3. The Global Asthma Report. 2014. Accessed February 1, 2023. http://globalasthmareport.org/2014/Global_Asthma_Report_2014.pdf.
4. Hanson TK, Aleman M, Hart L, Yawn B. Increasing availability toand ascertaining value of asthma action plans in schools throughuse of technology and community collaboration. J Sch Health.2013;83:915-920. doi:10.1111/josh.12110
5. Harrington CB, Langhans E, Shelef DQ, Savitz M, Whitmore C,Teach SJ. A pilot randomized trial of school-based administrationof inhaled corticosteroids for at-risk children with asthma. JAsthma. 2018;55(2):145-151.
6. Patrik J. Simulation. In. Patric J, Editor. Training:Research andPractice. London:Academic Press; 2002. p.487-508.
7. Yuan HB, Williams BA, Fang JB, Ye QH. A systematic review ofselected evidence on improving knowledge and skills throughhigh-fidelity simulation. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(3);294-298.
8. Lapkin S, Levett-JonesT, Bellchambers H, Fernandez R.Effectiveness of patient simulation manikins in teaching clinicalreasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: a systematicreview. Clin Simulation Nurs. 2010;6(6);e207-e222.
9. Goodstone L, Goodstone MS, Cino K, Glaser CA, KupfermanK, Dember-Neal. T. Effect of simulation on the development ofcritical thinking in associate degree nursing students. Nurs EducPerspect. 2013;34(3):159-162.
10. Unal E, Ozdemir A. The effect of hybrid simulated burn caretraining on nursing students&#39; knowledge, skills, and empathy: arandomised controlled trial. Nurse Educ Today. 2023;126:105828.doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105828
11. Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Bowling AM, NwaforCE, Tsaras K. High-fidelity simulation and nursing students&#39;anxiety and self-confidence: a systematic review. Nurs Forum.2019;54(3):358-368. doi:10.1111/nuf.12337
12. &Ouml;zdemir A, &Uuml;nal E. The effect of breast self-examination trainingon nursing students by using hybrid-based simulation onknowledge, skills, and ability to correctly evaluate pathologicalfindings: randomized controlled study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022;66:103530. doi:10. 1016/j.nepr.2022.103530.
13. Lee LYK, Lee JKL, Wong KF, Tsang AYK., Li MK. The establishmentof an integrated skills training centre for undergraduate nursingeducation. Int Nurs Rev. 2010;57(3):359-364. doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00796.x
14. Shaughnessy AF, Chang KT, Sparks J, Cohen-Osher M, Gravel Jr J.Assessing and documenting the cognitive performance of familymedicine residents practicing outpatient medicine. J Grad MedEduc. 2014;6(3):526-531.
15. Tuma F, Nassar K. Applying Bloom&#39;s taxonomy in clinical surgery:practical examples. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;69:102656.
16. Solnick A, Weiss S. High fidelity simulation in nursing education:areview of the literature. Clin Simulation Nurs. 2007;3(1):e41-e45.
17. Onc&uuml; E, Vayısoğlu SK, Lafci D, Yurtsever D, Bulut ER, PekerE. Comparison of interactive education versus fluorescentconcretization on hand hygiene compliance among primaryschool students:a randomized controlled trial. J School Nurs.2019;35(5):337-347. doi:10.1177/ 1059840518785447.
18. Jeffries PR, Rizzolo MA. Designing and implementing models forthe innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adultsand children: a national, multi-site, multi-method study. NewYork, NY:National League for Nursing; 2006.
19. Phrampus PE, O&rsquo;Donnell JM. Debriefing using a structured andsupported approach. In The comprehensive textbook of healthcaresimulation. Springer. 2013:73-84
20. Drummond D, Truchot J, Fabbro E, et al. Fixed versus variablepractice for teaching medical students the management ofpediatric asthma exacerbations using simulation. Eur J Pediatr.2018;177(2):211-219. doi:10.1007/s00431-017-3054-1
21. Lee JJ, Jeong HC, Kang KA, Kim YJ, Lee MN. Developmentof a simulation scenario and evaluation checklist for patientswith asthma in emergency care. CIN: Comput Inform Nurs.2015;33(12):546-554. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000193
22. Bortolato-Major C, Mantovani MDF, Felix JVC, Boostel R, Silva&Acirc;TMD, Caravaca-Morera JA. Debriefing evaluation in nursingclinical simulation:a cross-sectional study. Rev Bras Enferm.2019;72:788-794. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0103
23. Tawfik MM, Fayed AA, Dawood AF, Al Mussaed E, Ibrahim GH.Simulation-based learning versus didactic lecture in teachingbronchial asthma for undergraduate medical students: a steptoward improvement of clinical competencies. Med Sci Educ.2020;30(3):1061-1068.
24. Alamrani MH, Alammar KA, Alqahtani SS, Salem OA.Comparing the effects of simulation-based and traditionalteaching methods on the critical thinking abilities and self-confidence of nursing students. J Nurs Res. 2018;26(3):152-157.doi:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000231
25. Sch&ouml;n DA. The Reflective Practitioner:How Professionals Thinkin Action (1st ed.). Routledge. 1992. Accessed February 1, 2023.
Volume 6, Issue 5, 2023
Page : 925-931
_Footer