1.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA CancerJ Clin. 2019;69(1):7-34. doi:10.3322/caac.21551
2.
Vitale SG, Capriglione S, Zito G, et al. Management of endometrial,ovarian and cervical cancer in the elderly: current approach to achallenging condition. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(2):299-315.doi:10.1007/s00404-018-5006-z
3.
Health UNIo. National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, SurveillanceResearch Program, Cancer Statistics Branch. Surveillance,Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). Program Research Data(1973-2008). 2015.
4.
Sorosky JI. Endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(2 Pt1):383-397. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182605bf1
5.
Krouskop TA, Dougherty DR, Vinson FS. A pulsed Dopplerultrasonic system for making noninvasive measurements ofthe mechanical properties of soft tissue. J Rehabil Res Dev.1987;24(2):1-8.
6.
Lerner RM, Huang SR, Parker KJ. "Sonoelasticity" images derivedfrom ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. UltrasoundMed Biol. 1990;16(3):231-239. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(90)90002-t
7.
Emelianov SY, Lubinski MA, Weitzel WF, Wiggins RC, SkovorodaAR, O'Donnell M. Elasticity imaging for early detection ofrenal pathology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21(7):871-883.doi:10.1016/0301-5629(94)00146-5
8.
Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X.eElastography:a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biologicaltissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991;13(2):111-134. doi:10.1177/016173469101300201
9.
Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, et al. WFUMB guidelinesand recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography:Part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol.2015;41(5):1126-1147. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.009
10.
Liu Z, Jing H, Han X, et al. Shear wave elastography combined withthe thyroid imaging reporting and data system for malignancy riskstratification in thyroid nodules. Oncotarget. 2017;8(26):43406-43416. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15018
11.
Lee HY, Lee JH, Shin JH, et al. Shear wave elastographyusing ultrasound: effects of anisotropy and stretch stress on atissue phantom and in vivo reactive lymph nodes in the neck.Ultrasonography. 2017;36(1):25-32. doi:10.14366/usg.16003
12.
Ariji Y, Nakayama M, Nishiyama W, Nozawa M, Ariji E.Shear-wave sonoelastography for assessing masseter musclehardness in comparison with strain sonoelastography: studywith phantoms and healthy volunteers. Dentomaxillofac Radiol.2016;45(2):20150251. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20150251
13.
Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, Park IA, Yi A, Moon WK.Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastographyin the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJRAm J Roentgenol. 2013;201(2):347-356. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10416
14.
Cong Y, Fan Z, Dai Y, Zhang Z, Yan K. Application value of shearwave elastography in the evaluation of tumor downstaging for locallyadvanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. JUltrasound Med. 2021;40(1):81-89. doi:10.1002/jum.15378
15.
Zhao HX, Du YY, Guo YJ, et al. Application value of real-timeshear wave elastography in diagnosing the depth of infiltratingmuscular layer of endometrial cancer. J Ultrasound Med.2021;40(9):1851-1861. doi:10.1002/jum.15568
16.
Liu C, Li TT, Hu Z, et al. Transvaginal real-time shear waveelastography in the diagnosis of cervical disease. J UltrasoundMed. 2019;38(12):3173-3181. doi:10.1002/jum.15018
17.
Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML, et al. Elastography assessmentof liver fibrosis: society of radiologists in ultrasound consensusconference statement. Radiology. 2015;276(3):845-861.doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150619
18.
Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Meyer G, Weber S, Zeuzem S, Friedrich-Rust M. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benignand malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid.2010;20(10):1145-1150. doi:10.1089/thy.2010.0079
19.
Bakay OA, Golovko TS. Use of elastography for cervical cancerdiagnostics. Exp Oncol. 2015;37(2):139-145.
20.
Bian J, Li J, Liu Y. Diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastographyfor endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore).2023;102(4):e32700. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000032700
21.
Murali R, Davidson B, Fadare O, et al. High-grade EndometrialCarcinomas: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Features,Diagnostic Challenges and Recommendations. Int J GynecolPathol. 2019;38 Suppl 1(Iss 1 Suppl 1):S40-S63. doi:10.1097/PGP.0000000000000491
22.
Koyama T, Tamai K, Togashi K. Staging of carcinoma of theuterine cervix and endometrium. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(8):2009-2019. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0555-0
23.
Fukuhara T, Matsuda E, Endo Y, et al. Correlation betweenquantitative shear wave elastography and pathologic structuresof thyroid lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(9):2326-2332.doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.05.001
24.
Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESPguidelines for the management of patients with endometrialcarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(1):12-39. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230
25.
Fujimoto T, Nanjyo H, Fukuda J, et al. Endometrioid uterinecancer: histopathological risk factors of local and distantrecurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(2):342-347. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.019
26.
Grigsby PW, Perez CA, Kuten A, et al. Clinical stage I endometrialcancer: prognostic factors for local control and distant metastasisand implications of the new FIGO surgical staging system. Int JRadiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;22(5):905-911. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(92)90786-h
27.
Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, et al.Outcome of high-risk stage IC, grade 3, compared with stage Iendometrial carcinoma patients: the postoperative radiationtherapy in endometrial carcinoma Trial. J Clin Oncol. Apr 12004;22(7):1234-1241. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.08.159
28.
Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Bradley K, et al. NCCN Guidelines(R) Insights: uterine neoplasms, version 3.2021. J Natl ComprCanc Netw. 2021;19(8):888-895. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0038
29.
Gungorduk K, Muallem J, Asicioglu O, et al. Survival outcomesof women with grade 3 endometrioid endometrial cancer: theimpact of adjuvant treatment strategies. Arch Gynecol Obstet.2022;305(3):671-681. doi:10.1007/s00404-021-06187-4
30.
Baek MH, Park YR, Suh DS, et al. Reliability of tumour grade 1and endometrioid cell type on preoperative endometrial biopsy.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(1):79-81. doi:10.3109/01443615.2014.935723
31.
Visser NCM, Reijnen C, Massuger L, Nagtegaal ID, Bulten J,Pijnenborg JMA. Accuracy of endometrial sampling in endometrialcarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol.2017;130(4):803-813. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002261
32.
Alcazar JL, Gaston B, Navarro B, Salas R, Aranda J, Guerriero S.Transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging forpreoperative assessment of myometrial infiltration in patientswith endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JGynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e86. doi:10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e86
33.
Shao J, Shen Y, Lu J, Wang J. Ultrasound scoring in combinationwith ultrasound elastography for differentiating benign andmalignant thyroid nodules. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;83(2):254-260. doi:10.1111/cen.12589
34.
Du YY, Yan XJ, Guo YJ, et al. Transvaginal real-time shear waveelastography in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions. Int J GenMed. 2021;14:2849-2856. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S312292
35.
Hohn AK, Brambs CE, Hiller GGR, May D, Schmoeckel E, HornLC. 2020 WHO classification of female genital tumors. GeburtshilfeFrauenheilkd. 2021;81(10):1145-1153. doi:10.1055/a-1545-4279