JHSM
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

ISSN: Active
eISSN: 2636-8579
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Submit Manuscript

Index
Original Article
Examining the influence of sample rejection rates on the carbon footprint of clinical laboratories: a retrospective analysis
Abstract
Aims: Clinical laboratories play a vital role in healthcare, yet their operations contribute to resource consumption, waste generation, and greenhouse gas emissions. The need for sustainable practices in laboratories has led to guidelines for reducing their carbon footprint. This study aims to assess the impact of sample rejection rates (SRRs) on laboratory sustainability by calculating the carbon footprint and medical waste generated due to rejected samples.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center study obtained data from the Hospital Information Management System for two years (2021 and 2022). SRRs were calculated for different sample tube types. The carbon footprint caused by rejected samples was calculated using CO2 emission (CO2e) conversion factors. The weight of medical waste generated due to rejected samples was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests.
Results: In 2021 and 2022, SRRs for different sample tubes were calculated, with statistically significant differences observed. The total CO2e value resulting from rejected samples over two years was 12.3 tons, and the medical waste generated was 3.7 tons. The highest SRR was observed in Blue top tubes, while yellow top tubes showed a significant reduction in SRR in 2022.
Conclusion: This study highlights the impact of SRRs on laboratory sustainability. The calculated CO2e and medical waste values underscore the need to minimize sample rejections. While these values seem minor compared to global emissions, they reflect only a portion of the potential environmental impact. Reducing sample rejections not only improves patient safety and laboratory efficiency but also aligns with the larger goal of creating environmentally conscious and sustainable healthcare practices.

Keywords : Clinical laboratories, sustainability, environmental impact, waste reduction, preanalytical errors, sustainable healthcare

Download Article


1. Plebani M, Laposata M, Lippi G. Driving the route of laboratorymedicine: a manifesto for the future. Intern Emerg Med. 2019;14(3):337-340. doi:10.1007/s11739-019-02053-z
2. EFLM. EFLM guidelines for green and sustainable laboratories,1st ed. Belgium: The European Federation of Clinical Chemistryand Laboratory Medicine; 2022. Accessed April 4, 2023. https://www.eflm.eu/upload/docs/eflm-greenlab-booklet.pdf.
3. Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratorymedicine? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(6):750-759. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2006.123
4. Carraro P, Servidio G, Plebani M. Hemolyzed specimens: a reasonfor rejection or a clinical challenge? Clin Chem. 2000;46(2):306-307. doi:10.1093/clinchem/46.2.306
5. Gunnur Dikmen Z, Pinar A, Akbiyik F. Specimen rejection inlaboratory medicine: necessary for patient safety? Biochem Med(Zagreb). 2015;25(3):377-385. doi:10.11613/BM.2015.037
6. ISO 14001:2015. Environmental management systems -Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: InternationalOrganization for Standardization (ISO); 2015.
7. Carraro P, Plebani M. Errors in a stat laboratory: types andfrequencies 10 years later. Clin Chem. 2007;53(7):1338-1342.doi:10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344
8. Atay A, Demir L, Cuhadar S, et al. Clinical biochemistrylaboratory rejection rates due to various types of preanalyticalerrors. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014;24(3):376-382. doi:10.11613/BM.2014.040
9. Endris S, Tamir Z, Sisay A. Medical laboratory waste generationrate, management practices and associated factors in AddisAbaba, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0266888. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0266888
10. McAlister S, Barratt AL, Bell KJ, McGain F. The carbon footprint ofpathology testing. Med J Aust. 2020;212(8):377-382. doi:10.5694/mja2.50583
11. McAlister S, Grant T, McGain F. An LCA of hospital pathologytesting. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2021;26(9):1753-1763. doi:10.1007/s11367-021-01959-1
12. TURKSTAT Greenhouse gas emissions statistics. Accessed April 5, 2023.https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions-Statistics-1990-2021-49672&dil=2#:~:text=TURKSTAT%20Corporate&text=The%20greenhouse%20gas%20inventory%20results,-4%20tonnes%20CO2%20eq.
13. Crippa M, Guizzardi D, Banja M, et al. CO2 emissions of allworld countries - JRC/IEA/PBL 2022 report, EUR 31182 EN,Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022,doi:10.2760/730164
14. Nicolet J, Mueller Y, Paruta P, Boucher J, Senn N. What is thecarbon footprint of primary care practices? A retrospective life-cycle analysis in Switzerland. Environ Health. 2022;21(1):1-10.doi:10.1186/s12940-021-00814-y
15. World Health Organization. Healthcare waste. Accessed April 5,2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/health-care-waste.
16. Lopez JB, Jackson D, Gammie A, Badrick T. Reducing theenvironmental impact of clinical laboratories. Clin Biochem Rev.2017;38(1):3-11.
17. Gammie AJ, Lopez JB, Scott S. Imperative: reducing theenvironmental impact of clinical laboratories. Clin Chem LabMed. 2023;61(4):634-637. doi:10.1515/cclm-2022-1052
18. Rin GD. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducinglaboratory errors. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404(1):68-74. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.024
19. Aykal G, Keşapli M, Aydin Ö, et al. Pre-test and post-testapplications to shape the education of phlebotomists in a qualitymanagement program: an experience in a training hospital. J MedBiochem. 2016;35(3):347-353. doi:10.1515/jomb-2016-0011
20. Shrank WH, Rogstad TL, Parekh N. Waste in the US healthcare system: estimated costs and potential for savings. JAMA.2019;322(15):1501-1509. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.13978
21. Molero A, Calabrò M, Vignes M, Gouget B, Gruson D.Sustainability in healthcare: perspectives and reflectionsregarding laboratory medicine. Ann Lab Med. 2021;41(2):139-144. doi:10.3343/alm.2021.41.2.139
22. Bindraban RS, Berg MJ, Naaktgeboren CA, Kramer MHH, SolingeWW, Nanayakkara PWB. Reducing test utilization in hospitalsettings: a narrative review. Ann Lab Med. 2018;38(5):402-412.doi:10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.402
23. Pennestrì F, Banfi G. Value-based healthcare: the role of laboratorymedicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;57(6):798-801. doi:10.1515/cclm-2018-1245
Article available in :
Volume 6, Issue 5, 2023
Page : 993-997
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1342155
Article Information
Received : 12 Ağu 2023
Accepted : 01 Eyl 2023
Published : 28 Eyl 2023
Corresponding Author :

Kamil Taha Uçar: Department of Medical Biochemistry, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey

[email protected]
Citation : Uçar KT. Examining the influence of sample rejection rates on the carbon footprint of clinical laboratories: a retrospective analysis. J Health Sci Med. 2023;6(5):993-997.

Read: 223
Cited: 1
Download : 170
_Footer