JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Predictors for axillary lymph node metastasis in primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast and neuroendocrine differentiated breast cancers
Aims: Primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast (NEC) and neuroendocrine differentiated breast cancers are rare entities. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical and histopathological findings and predictors for axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast (NEC) and neuroendocrine differentiated breast cancers (NEBC).
Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer with histopathological neuroendocrine features between the years 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively screened. The patients were divided into two main groups, the NEC and NEBC groups. The two groups were evaluated in terms of their clinical and histopathological characteristics and predictive factors for axillary lymph node.
Results: A total of 35 patients [NEBC group: 24 patients, NEC group: 11 patients) were evaluated. At the time of diagnosis, the median age was 57 (NEC: 49 years, NEBC: 57.5). Of the 35 patients, 15 (57.1%) had ALNM, and lymphovascular invasion was detected in 16 (45.7%). When the whole patient population was evaluated for ALNM, it was found that lymphovascular invasion had an effect on ALNM (p=0.005). In the NEBC group, the rate of ALNM was associated with an increase in tumor diameter (p=0.035). Additionally, the tumor diameter was found to be predictive of ALNM in the ROC analysis (AUC: 0.753, 95% CI: 0.557-0.950, cut-off: 2.35 cm, p=0.035). Analyses of correlation revealed a low-level correlation between age and Ki-67 in the study cohort ( ?= -0.341, p=0.45).
Conclusion: NECs and NEBCs of the breast are uncommon tumors with a high ALNM potential. Patients with lymphovascular invasion and a large tumor diameter should be carefully evaluated for ALNM. Further research is required to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for these rare subtypes of breast cancers.


1. Kayadibi Y, Erginoz E, Cavus GH, Kurt SA, Ozturk T, VelidedeogluM. Primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast andneuroendocrine differentiated breast cancers: relationshipbetween histopathological and radiological features. Eur J Radiol.2022;147:110148. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110148
2. Trevisi E, La Salvia A, Daniele L, et al. Neuroendocrine breastcarcinoma: a rare but challenging entity. Med Oncol. 2020;37(8):70.doi:10.1007/s12032-020-01396-4
3. Bussolati G, Badve S. Carcinomas with neuroendocrine features.WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. 2012;4:62-3.
4. Tan PH, Ellis I, Allison K, et al. The 2019 World HealthOrganization classification of tumours of the breast.Histopathology. 2020;77(2):181-185. doi:10.1111/his.14091
5. Hacking SM, Yakirevich E, Wang Y. Defining triple-negativebreast cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation (TNBC-NED).J Pathol Clin Res. 2023;9(4):313-321. doi:10.1002/cjp2.318
6. Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, et al. NCCN Guidelines®Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2023. J Natl Compr Canc Netw.2023;21(6):594-608. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2023.0031
7. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt S, Tan PH, van de Vijver M. WHOClassification of Tumours of the Breast. WHO; 2012.
8. Rosen LE, Gattuso P. Neuroendocrine tumors of the breast. ArchPathol Lab Med. 2017;141(11):1577-1581. doi:10.5858/arpa.2016-0364-RS
9. Wang J, Wei B, Albarracin CT, Hu J, Abraham SC, Wu Y. Invasiveneuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast: a population-basedstudy from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER)database. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:147. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-147
10. Krawczyk N, Röwer R, Anlauf M, et al. Invasive breast carcinomawith neuroendocrine differentiation: a single-center analysisof clinical features and prognosis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd.2022;82(1):68-84. doi:10.1055/a-1557-1280
11. Makretsov N, Gilks CB, Coldman AJ, Hayes M, Huntsman D.Tissue microarray analysis of neuroendocrine differentiationand its prognostic significance in breast cancer. Hum Pathol.2003;34(10):1001-1008. doi:10.1053/s0046-8177(03)00411-8
12. van Krimpen C, Elferink A, Broodman CA, Hop WC, PronkA, Menke M. The prognostic influence of neuroendocrinedifferentiation in breast cancer: results of a long-term follow-upstudy. Breast. 2004;13(4):329-333. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2003.11.008
13. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA CancerJ Clin. 2017;67(1):7-30. doi:10.3322/caac.21387
14. Pan H, Gray R, Braybrooke J, et al. 20-year risks of breast-cancerrecurrence after stopping endocrine therapy at 5 years. N Engl JMed. 2017;377(19):1836-1846. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1701830
15. Lux MP, Schneeweiss A, Hartkopf AD, et al. Update breast cancer2020 part 5-moving therapies from advanced to early breastcancer patients. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021;81(4):469-480.doi:10.1055/a-1397-7170
16. Lavigne M, Menet E, Tille JC, et al. Comprehensive clinical andmolecular analyses of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast.Mod Pathol. 2018;31(1):68-82. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.107
17. Wei B, Ding T, Xing Y, et al. Invasive neuroendocrine carcinoma ofthe breast: a distinctive subtype of aggressive mammary carcinoma.Cancer. 2010;116(19):4463-4473. doi:10.1002/cncr.25352
18. Rovera F, Lavazza M, La Rosa S, et al. Neuroendocrine breastcancer: retrospective analysis of 96 patients and review of literature.Int J Surg. 2013;11(S1):79-83. doi:10.1016/s1743-9191(13)60023-0
19. Zhang Y, Chen Z, Bao Y, et al. Invasive neuroendocrine carcinomaof the breast: a prognostic research of 107 Chinese patients.Neoplasma. 2013;60(2):215-222. doi:10.4149/neo_2013_029
20. Cloyd JM, Yang RL, Allison KH, Norton JA, Hernandez-BoussardT, Wapnir IL. Impact of histological subtype on long-term outcomesof neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat.2014;148(3):637-644. doi:10.1007/s10549-014-3207-0
21. Kwon SY, Bae YK, Gu MJ, et al. Neuroendocrine differentiationcorrelates with hormone receptor expression and decreasedsurvival in patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Histopathology.2014;64(5):647-659. doi:10.1111/his.12306
22. Park YM, Wu Y, Wei W, Yang WT. Primary neuroendocrinecarcinoma of the breast: clinical, imaging, and histologicfeatures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(2):221-230. doi:10.2214/ajr.13.10749
23. Bogina G, Munari E, Brunelli M, et al. Neuroendocrinedifferentiation in breast carcinoma: clinicopathological featuresand outcome. Histopathology. 2016;68(3):422-432. doi:10.1111/his.12766
24. Roininen N, Takala S, Haapasaari KM, et al. Primaryneuroendocrine breast carcinomas are associated with poorlocal control despite favourable biological profile: a retrospectiveclinical study. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):72. doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3056-4
25. Metovic J, Cascardi E, Uccella S, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasmsof the breast: diagnostic agreement and impact on outcome.Virchows Archiv. 2022;481(6):839-846. doi:10.1007/s00428-022-03426-0
26. Yang L, Lin H, Shen Y, et al. Clinical outcome and therapeuticimpact on neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a nationalcancer database study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023:1-10.doi:10.1007/s10549-023-07052-5
27. Howlader N, NA KM, Miller D, et al. SEER Cancer StatisticsReview, 1975-2016. National Cancer Institute; 2019.
28. Sawaki M, Yokoi K, Nagasaka T, et al. Prognostic importance ofneuroendocrine differentiation in Japanese breast cancer patients.Surg Today. 2010;40(9):831-835. doi:10.1007/s00595-009-4179-2
29. Zhu X, Chen L, Huang B, et al. The prognostic and predictivepotential of Ki-67 in triple-negative breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):225. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-57094-3
30. Eble JN, Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. Pathology and genetics oftumours of the breast and female genital organs. IARC. 2003.
Volume 6, Issue 5, 2023
Page : 1098-1104
_Footer