JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Comparative analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgical training videos on WebSurg vs YouTube platforms: a quality evaluation
Aims: Minimally invasive surgical techniques, particularly laparoscopic methods for inguinal hernia repair, have gained popularity due to their benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery. This study aimed to compare the educational quality of laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgical training videos between YouTube and WebSurg platforms.
Methods: Using the keyword “laparoscopic inguinal hernia” we selected and analyzed top 20 videos based on popularity on both platforms. The study examined video sources, duration, likes, views, upload year, coverage of the entire surgical procedure, and evaluation scores (Global Quality Scale-GQS, American Medical Association-JAMA scores, modified DISCERN score, LAP-VEGaS criteria).
Results: YouTube predominantly featured private hospitals/organizations (30%) and physicians (45%), while WebSurg showcased academic institutions (75%). Notably, YouTube hosted mostly edited/abbreviated videos (95%), whereas WebSurg presented a balanced distribution of full-length (50%) and edited/abbreviated (50%) videos. While engagement metrics were comparable, WebSurg consistently achieved higher evaluation scores across various criteria, including modified DISCERN, GQS, JAMA, and LAP-VEGaS (p <0.001, p <.0.001, p=0.002 and p <0.001 respectively).
Conclusion: This study is the first to compare WebSurg and YouTube videos in laparoscopic hernia surgery education, revealing that WebSurg provides higher-quality content, highlighting the importance of platform choice for advancing surgical training.


1. Kumar A, Kaistha S, Gangavatiker R. Non-fixation versus fixationof mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: acomparative study. Indian J Surg. 2018;80(2):128-133.
2. Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, et al. YouTube is the mostfrequently used educational video source for surgical preparation.J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):1072-1076.
3. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, et al.Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. HealthInform J. 2015;21(3):173-194.
4. Gorgy A, El Hawary H, Galli R, MacDonald M, Barone N,Thibaudeau S. Evaluating the educational quality of surgicalYouTube&reg; videos: a systematic review. Health Sciences Review.2022;5:100067.
5. Yesilada M, Lewandowsky S. Systematic review: YouTuberecommendations and problematic content. Internet Policy Rev.2022;11(1):1652.
6. Mutter D, Vix M, Dallemange B, et al. WebSurg: an innovativeeducational Web site in minimally invasive surgery&mdash;principlesand results. Surg Innov. 2011;18(1):8-14
7. Celentano V, Smart N, McGrath J, et al. LAP-VEGaS practiceguidelines for reporting of educational videos in laparoscopicsurgery. Ann Surg. 2018;268(6):920-926.
8. Osman W, Mohamed F, Elhassan M, et al. Is YouTube a reliablesource of health-related information? A systematic review. BMCMed Educ. 2022;22(1):382.
9. Uprak TK, Ergen&ccedil; M. Assessment of esophagectomy videoson YouTube: is peer review necessary for quality? J Surg Res.2022;279:368-373.
10. Onder ME, Zengin O. YouTube as a source of information ongout: a quality analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41(7):1321-1328.
11. Krakowiak M, Rak M, Krakowiak P, et al. YouTube as a sourceof information on carbon monoxide poisoning: a content-qualityanalysis. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(3): 285-295.
12. Pathak R, Poudel DR, Karmacharya P, et al. YouTube as asource of information on ebola virus disease. N Am J Med Sci.2015;7(7):306-309.
13. Erdem H, Sislik A. The reliability of bariatric surgery videos inYouTube platform. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):712-716.
14. Nason GJ, Kelly P, Kelly ME, et al. YouTube as an educationaltool regarding male urethral catheterization. Scand J Urol.2015;49(2):189-192.
15. Basch CH, Zybert P, Reeves R, et al. What do popular YouTubevideos say about vaccines? Child Care Health Dev. 2017;43(4):499-503.
16. Hayanga AJ, Kaiser HE. Medical information on YouTube&reg;TM.JAMA. 2008;299(4):1424-1426.
17. Lee J, Kim MJ, Hur KY. The learning curve of the beginnersurgeon with supervisor for laparoscopic totally extraperitonealrepair. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2015;18(1):127-132.
18. Lim JW, Lee JY, Lee SE, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopictotally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy by moving average. J KoreanSurg Soc. 2012;83(2):92-96.
19. Huynh D, Fadaee N, G&ouml;k H, Wright A, Towfigh S. Thou shalt nottrust online videos for inguinal hernia repair techniques. SurgicalEndoscopy. 2021;35(10):5724-5728.
20. Yigit B, Citgez B. Assessment of the educational quality, accuracy,and transparency of websurg videos on minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e18942.
21. Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Filiz Aİ, et al. Comparison of newera&rsquo;s education platforms, YouTube&reg; and WebSurg&reg;, in sleevegastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29(11):3472-3477.
22. Kartal A, Kebudi A. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and qualityof information used in total extraperitoneal procedure for inguinalhernia repair videos shared on WebSurg. Cureus. 2019;11(9):e5566.
Volume 6, Issue 5, 2023
Page : 1109-1113
_Footer