1.
Aguado-Maestro I, Escudero-Marcos R, García-García JM, etal. Resultados y complicaciones de la osteosíntesis de fracturaspertrocantéreas de fémur mediante clavo endomedular con espiralcefálica (clavo femoral proximal antirrotación) en 200 pacientes.Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2013;57(3):201-207. doi:10.1016/j.recot.2013.03.001
2.
Frei HC, Hotz T, Cadosch D, Rudin M, Käch K. Central headperforation, or "cut through," caused by the helical blade ofthe proximal femoral nail antirotation. J Orthop Trauma.2012;26(8):e102-e107. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822c53c1
3.
Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylicintramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants forextracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2008;(3):CD000093. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub4
4.
Vaquero J, Munoz J, Prat S, et al. Proximal femoral nail antirotationversus Gamma3 nail for intramedullary nailing of unstabletrochanteric fractures. a randomised comparative study. Injury.2012;43 Suppl 2:S47-S54. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70179-7
5.
Brandt E, Verdonschot N. Biomechanical analysis of the slidinghip screw, cannulated screws and Targon1 FN in intracapsularhip fractures in cadaver femora. Injury. 2011;42(2):183-187.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.021
6.
Erez O, Dougherty PJ. Early complications associated withcephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric hip fractures. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(2):E101-E105. doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e31821c2ef2
7.
Zhang J, Tang X. The application of the 150° oblique tangentialfluoroscopic view to detect the posterosuperior femoral neckscrew in-out-in intraoperatively. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):12790.doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17221-z
8.
Chen SY, Chang SM, Tuladhar R, et al. A new fluoroscopic viewfor evaluation of anteromedial cortex reduction quality duringcephalomedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures:the 30° oblique tangential projection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.2020;21(1):719. doi:10.1186/s12891-020-03668-6
9.
Turgut A, Kalenderer O, Gunaydin, B, Onvural B. Karapınar L,Agus H. İntertrokanterik femur kırıklarının proksimal femoralçivi antirotasyon (PFNA) ile lateral dekübit pozisyonda tespiti.Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(5):513-520.
10.
Flierl MA, Stahel PF, Hak DJ, Morgan SJ, Smith WR. Traction table-related complications in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad OrthopSurg. 2010;18(11):668-675. doi:10.5435/00124635-201011000-00004
11.
Callanan I, Choudhry V, Smith H. Perineal sloughing as a resultof pressure necrosis from the traction post during prolongedbilateral femoral nailing. Injury. 1994;25(7):472. doi:10.1016/0020-1383(94)90276-3
12.
Brumback RJ, Ellison TS, Molligan H, Molligan DJ, Mahaffey S,Schmidhauser C. Pudendal nerve palsy complicating intramedullarynailing of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(10):1450-1455.
13.
Doğan N, Ertürk C, Gülabi D. Is proximal femoral nailing ofunstable intertrochanteric fractures in the lateral decubitusposition without a traction table as safe and effective as ona traction table?. Injury. 2022;53(2):555-560. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.017
14.
Sonmez MM, Camur S, Erturer E, Ugurlar M, Kara A,Ozturk I. Strategies for proximal femoral nailing of unstableintertrochanteric fractures: lateral decubitus position or tractiontable. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(3):e37-e44. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00691
15.
Jong-Keon O, Jin-Ho H, Dipit S. Nailing of IntertrochantericFractures: Review on Pitfalls and Technical Tips. Journal ofOrthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation. 2010;14(2):3-7.doi:10.1016/j.jotr.2010.08.006
16.
Liu W, Zhou D, Liu F, Weaver MJ, Vrahas MS. Mechanicalcomplications of intertrochanteric hip fractures treatedwith trochanteric femoral nails. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.2013;75(2):304-310. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a2c43
17.
Turgut A, Kalenderer Ö, Karapınar L, Kumbaracı M, Akkan HA,Ağuş H. Which factor is most important for occurrence of cutoutcomplications in patients treated with proximal femoral nailantirotation? Retrospective analysis of 298 patients. Arch OrthopTrauma Surg. 2016;136(5):623-630. doi:10.1007/s00402-016-2410-3
18.
Kristan A, Benulic C, Jaklic M. Reduction of trochantericfractures in lateral view is significant predictor for radiologicaland functional result after six months. Injury. 2021;52(10):3036-3041. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.038
19.
Campbell SE. Radiography of the hip: lines, signs, and patternsof disease. Semin Roentgenol. 2005;40(3):290-319. doi:10.1053/j.ro.2005.01.016
20.
Lim SJ, Park YS. Plain radiography of the hip: a review ofradiographic techniques and image features. Hip Pelvis. 2015;27(3):125-134. doi:10.5371/hp.2015.27.3.125
21.
Herman A, Landau Y, Gutman G, Ougortsin V, Chechick A,Shazar N. Radiological evaluation of intertrochanteric fracturefixation by the proximal femoral nail. Injury. 2012;43(6):856-863.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.030
22.
Ciufo DJ, Zaruta DA, Lipof JS, Judd KT, Gorczyca JT, Ketz JP.Risk factors associated with cephalomedullary nail cutout inthe treatment of trochanteric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma.2017;31(11):583-588. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000961
23.
Aibinder WR, Yuan BJ, Cross WW 3rd, Parry JA. Sequentialfluoroscopic rollover images reliably identify "in-out-in"posterosuperior screws during percutaneous fixation of femoralneck fractures. Eur J Orthopaedic Surg Traumatol. 2020;30(6):1061-1065. doi:10.1007/s00590-020-02668-5.
24.
Schep NW, van Walsum T, De Graaf JS, Broeders IA, van derWerken C. Validation of fluoroscopy-based navigation in thehip region: what you see is what you get?. Comput Aided Surg.2002;7(5):279-283. doi:10.1002/igs.10051
25.
Bishop JA, Rodriguez EK. Closed intramedullary nailing of thefemur in the lateral decubitus position. J Trauma. 2010;68(1):231-235. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c488d8
26.
Nikoloski AN, Osbrough AL, Yates PJ. Should the tip-apexdistance (TAD) rule be modified for the proximal femoral nailantirotation (PFNA)? A retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res.2013;8:35. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-8-35
27.
Sadic S, Custovic S, Jasarevuc M, Fazlic M, Krupic F. Proximalfemoral nail antirotation in treatment of intertrochanterichip fractures: a retrospective study in 113 patients. Med Arch.2015;69(6):352-6. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2015.69.353-356.
28.
Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ Jr,Ishizuka T. A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures ofthe femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:1399-1408.
29.
Hwang JH, Garg AK, Oh JK, et al. A biomechanical evaluation ofproximal femoral nail antirotation with respect to helical bladeposition in femoral head: a cadaveric study. Indian J Orthop.2012;46(6):627-632. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.104186
30.
Parker MJ. Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to itsposition. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(4):625. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.74B4.1624529
31.
Hengg C, Mayrhofer P, Euler S, Wambacher M, Blauth M,Kralinger F. The relevance of neutral arm positioning for trueap-view X-ray to provide true projection of the humeral headshaft angle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(2):213-221.doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2368-6
32.
Moshina N, Bjørnson EW, Holen ÅS, et al. Standardised orindividualised X-ray tube angle for mediolateral obliqueprojection in digital mammography?. Radiography (Lond).2022;28(3):772-778. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2022.03.002
33.
Tan W, Ong YS, Ng CYQ, Kwok KY, Tan CYY, Sng LH. Anatomicaltilt lateral wrist X-ray - Not always 22°. Radiography (Lond).2023;29(4):807-811. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2023.05.010