JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Review
Enhancing dermatology: the current landscape and future prospects of augmented and virtual reality technologies
This article aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current status and future potential of augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) technologies in the field of dermatology. We conducted an extensive review of the existing literature, encompassing studies and case reports related to the utilization of AR/VR in dermatology. This analysis encompassed diverse applications, including medical education, diagnostics, and dermatologic surgery, to offer a holistic view of their current implementations. Despite the significant interest generated within the dermatological community, the integration of AR/VR technologies in dermatology has not advanced at the same pace as in surgery. Our review underscores the current applications of AR/VR, which encompass improving medical education through interactive simulations, enhancing diagnostic precision, and facilitating complex dermatologic surgical procedures. Additionally, we address the challenges and constraints associated with their practical implementation in clinical settings. Augmented and virtual reality technologies possess immense potential to transform the landscape of dermatology. While their adoption has been gradual, these technologies have showcased their ability to enhance medical education, diagnostics, and surgical interventions. The future holds promising prospects for further developments in AR/VR applications, positioning them as valuable assets for dermatologists and aspiring dermatologists alike. However, it is imperative to address issues related to accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and patient acceptance to foster their widespread integration into clinical practice.


1. Azuma RT. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators& Virtual Environments. 1997;6(4):355-385.
2. Reznick RK, MacRae H. Medical education-teaching surgicalskills-changes in the wind. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(25):2664-2669.
3. Obagi Z, Rundle C, Dellavalle R. Widening the scope of virtualreality and augmented reality in dermatology. Dermatol Online J.2020;26(6):13030.
4. Sharma P, Vleugels RA, Nambudiri VE. Augmented realityin dermatology: are we ready for AR? J Am Acad Dermatol.2019;81(5):1216-1222.
5. Prado G. Kovarik C. Cutting edge technology in dermatology:virtual reality and artificial ıntelligence. Cutis. 2018;101(3):236-237.
6. Noll C, Haussermann B, von Jan U, et al. Mobile augmentedreality in dermatology. Biomed Eng-Biomed Tech. 2014;59(S1):S1216-S1220.
7. Noll C, von Jan U, Raap U, Albrecht U-V. Mobile augmentedreality as a feature for self-oriented, blended learning inmedicine: randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth.2017;5(3):e7943.
8. Aldridge RB, Li XA, Ballerini L, Rees JL. Teaching dermatologyusing 3-dimensional virtual reality. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(10):1184-1185.
9. Kantor, J. Application of google glass to mohs micrographicsurgery: a pilot study in 120 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(2):288-289.
10. Gladstone HB, Raugi GJ, Berg D, Berkley J, Weghorst S, Ganter M.Virtual reality for dermatologic surgery: virtually a reality in the21st century. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(1):106-112.
11. Zhang S, Blalock TW. Measuring cutaneous lesions: Trends inclinical practice. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(3):383-387.
12. Federman DG, Kirsner RS. The abilities of primary care physiciansin dermatology: implications for quality of care. Am J ManagCare. 1997;3(10):1487-1492.
13. Garg A, Haley H-L, Hatem D. Modern moulage evaluating the useof 3-dimensional prosthetic mimics in a dermatology teachingprogram for second-year medical students. Arch Dermatol.2010;146(2):143-146.
14. Culp MB, Lunsford NB. Melanoma among non-hispanicblack Americans. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019;16:E79 doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180640
15. Caryn Rabin R. Dermatology’s skin color problem. The New YorkTimes. 2020;p.1.
16. Ghorbani A, Natarajan V, Coz D, Liu Y. DermGAN: Syntheticgeneration of clinical skin images with pathology. In Proceedingsof the Machine Learning for Health NeurIPS Workshop. ProcMach Learn Res. 2020;116:155-170.
17. Horsham C, Dutton-Regester K, Antrobus J, Goldston, A et al.A virtual reality game to change sun protection behavior andprevent cancer: user-centered design approach. JMIR SeriousGames. 2021;9(1):e24652.
18. Virtual Derm Is a Health Education app, Meant to Provide aTraining Platform to Help Medical Students and DermatologistsTraining Their Observational, Diagnostic and Treatment/Care Skills for a Better Patient Care in Dermatology. Version2.0, 2020. Updated June 2, 2020. Accessed August 23. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.HumanGames.VirtualDerm2&hl=en&gl=US
19. Hale E. Handbook of dermatologic surgery. Springer: New York,NY, USA, 2014.
20. Khor WS, Baker B, Amin K. Augmented and virtual reality insurgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitationsand legal pitfalls. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4.
21. Berg D, Raugi G, Gladstone H. Virtual reality simulators fordermatologic surgery: measuring their validity as a teaching tool.Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(4):370-374.
22. Higgins S, Feinstein S, Hawkins M. Virtual reality to ımprovethe experience of the mohs patient-a prospective interventionalstudy. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(7):1009-1018.
23. Rodriguez-Jimenez P, Ruiz-Rodriguez R. Augmented reality inMohs micrographic surgery. Int J Dermatol. 2020; 59(10):E22-E23.
24. Young AT, Xiong ML, Pfau J, et al. Artificial intelligence indermatology: a primer. J Investig Dermatol. 2020;140(7):1504-1512.
25. Francese R, Frasca M, Risi M. A mobile augmented realityapplication for supporting real-time skin lesion analysis based ondeep learning. J Real-Time Image Process. 2021;18(5):1247-1259.
26. Freeman K, Dinnes J, Chuchu N. Algorithm based smartphoneapps to assess risk of skin cancer in adults: Systematic review ofdiagnostic accuracy studies. Bmj-Br Med J. 2020;368:m127.
27. Sun MD, Kentley J, Mehta P, Dusza S, Halpern AC, Rotemborg V.Accuracy of commercially available smartphone applications forthe detection of melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186(4):744.
28. Chuchu N, Takwoingi Y, Dinnes J. Smartphone applications fortriaging adults with skin lesions that are suspicious for melanoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(12). doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013192
29. Srinivasan MA, Basdogan C. Haptics in virtual environments:taxonomy, research status, and challenges. Comput Graph.1997;21(4):393-404.
30. Waldron KJ, Enedah C, Gladstone H. Stiffness and textureperception for teledermatology. Stud Health Technol Inform.2005;111:579-585.
31. Kim K, Lee S. Perception-based 3D tactile rendering from a singleimage for human skin examinations by dynamic touch. Ski ResTechnol. 2015;21(2):164-174.
32. Kim K. Roughness based perceptual analysis towards digitalskin imaging system with haptic feedback. Ski Res Technol.2016;22(3):334-340.
33. Parsons D, MacCallum K. Current perspectives on augmentedreality in medical education: applications affordances andlimitations. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021;12:77-91. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S249891
34. Xu X, Mangina E, Campbell AG. HMD-based virtual andaugmented reality in medical education: a systematic review.Front Virtual Real. 2021;2:692103.
35. Kassutto SM, Baston C, Clancy C. Virtual, augmented, andalternate reality in medical education: socially distanced but fullyımmersed. ATS Sch. 2021;2(4):651-664.
Volume 7, Issue 1, 2024
Page : 131-136
_Footer