JHSM
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

ISSN: Active
eISSN: 2636-8579
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Submit Manuscript

Index
Original Article
Evaluation of the success of anterior iliac crest harvested bone graft in reconstruction of different jaw defects: a retrospective study
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of bone grafts obtained from the anterior iliac crest, the recipient and donor site complications in the reconstruction of jaw defects caused by different etiologies in maxillofacial surgery.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University between 2012-2022. It included patients with iliac crest harvested bone grafts due to jaw defect with full records. The primary predictive variable was the type of jaw defect. The primary outcomes were the presence of complications at donor and recipient sites. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and type of complications at donor and recipient sites. The obtained data were analyzed with Kruskal Wallis Test, Pearson’s chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test.
Results: This study included 104 (44 female, 60 male) patients. Complication rate was 21.15%. There was no statistically significant relationship between the type of jaw defect and the success of iliac bone grafts (p=0.257). The most common recipient site complication was resorption in alveolar atrophy groups, the dehiscence in alveolar cleft groups, infection in other reason groups. There was no statistically significant relationship between type of jaw defect and complication types (p=0.524).
Conclusion: The results of the study demonstrate that general success rate was 78.85% in jaw reconstruction with anterior iliac crest harvested bone grafts. The major complication rate causing total graft loss was 13.46%. There was no statistically significant relationship between the type of jaw defect and the success of iliac bone grafts.

Keywords : Jaw defects, iliac crest, reconstruction

Download Article


1. Ferraz MP. Bone grafts in dental medicine: an overview of autografts, allografts and synthetic materials. <em>Materials (Basel)</em>. 2023;16(11). doi:10.3390/MA16114117
2. Sethi A, Kaus T, Cawood JI, Plaha H, Boscoe M, Sochor P. Onlay bone grafts from iliac crest: a retrospective analysis. <em>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2020;49(2):264-271. doi:10.1016/J.IJOM.2019.07.001
3. Kessler P, Thorwarth M, Bloch-Birkholz A, Nkenke E, Neukam FW. Harvesting of bone from the iliac crest-comparison of the anterior and posterior sites. <em>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2005;43(1): 51-56. doi:10.1016/J.BJOMS.2004.08.026
4. Wortmann DE, van Minnen B, Delli K, Schortinghuis J, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Harvesting anterior iliac crest or calvarial bone grafts to augment severely resorbed edentulous jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes. <em>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2023;52(4):481-494. doi:10.1016/J.IJOM.2022.09.002
5. Mertens C, Decker C, Seeberger R, Hoffmann J, Sander A, Freier K. Early bone resorption after vertical bone augmentation-a comparison of calvarial and iliac grafts. <em>Clin Oral Implants Res</em>. 2013;24(7):820-825. doi:10.1111/J.1600-0501.2012.02463.X
6. Fasolis M, Boffano P, Ramieri G. Morbidity associated with anterior iliac crest bone graft. <em>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol</em>. 2012;114(5):586-591. doi:10.1016/J.OOOO.2012.01.038
7. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, Corsi E. Evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption around Straumann Bone Level&copy; implants placed in areas reconstructed with autogenous vertical onlay bone grafts. <em>Clin Oral Implants Res</em>. 2012;23(9):1012-1021. doi:10.1111/J.1600-0501.2011.02262.X
8. Kalk WWI, Raghoebar GM, Jansma J, Boering G. Morbidity from lilac crest bone harvesting. <em>J Oral Maxillofac Surg.</em> 1996; 54(12):1424-1429. doi:10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90257-8
9. Tosun E, Akkocaoglu M, T&uuml;z HH, Avag C, G&ouml;kt&uuml;rk T. Complications associated with anterior iliac bone grafting for the reconstruction of dentoalveolar defects. <em>J Craniofac Surg</em>. 2019;30(4):980-984. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005331
10. Hynes PJ, Earley MJ. Assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting using a modification of the Bergland grading system. <em>Br J Plast Surg</em>. 2003;56(7):630-636.
11. Katz MS, Ooms M, Heitzer M, et al. Postoperative morbidity and complications in elderly patients after harvesting of iliac crest bone grafts. <em>Medicina (B Aires)</em>. 2021;57(8). doi:10.3390/MEDICINA57080759
12. Rawashdeh MA, Telfah H. Secondary alveolar bone grafting: the dilemma of donor site selection and morbidity. <em>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2008;46(8):665-670. doi:10.1016/J.BJOMS.2008. 07.184
13. McLain RF, Techy F. Trephine technique for iliac crest bone graft harvest: long-term results. <em>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</em>. 2021;46(1):41-47. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003702
14. Mckenna GJ, Gjengedal H, Harkin J, Holland N, Moore C, Srinivasan M. effect of autogenous bone graft site on dental implant survival and donor site complicatıons: a systematıc review and meta-analysis. <em>J Evid Based Dent Pract</em>. 2022;22(3). doi:10.1016/J.JEBDP.2022.101731
15. Grossman MG, Ducey SA, Nadler SS, Levy AS. Meralgia paresthetica: diagnosis and treatment. <em>J Am Acad Orthop Surg</em>. 2001;9(5):336-344. doi:10.5435/00124635-200109000-00007
16. Nkenke E, Weisbach V, Winckler E, et al. Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: a prospective study. <em>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2004; 33(2):157-163. doi:10.1054/IJOM.2003.0465
17. Moura LB, Carvalho PH de A, Xavier CB, et al. Autogenous non-vascularized bone graft in segmental mandibular reconstruction: a systematic review. <em>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2016;45(11):1388-1394. doi:10.1016/J.IJOM.2016.05.004
18. van Gemert JTM, van Es RJJ, Van Cann EM, Koole R. Nonvascularized bone grafts for segmental reconstruction of the mandible-a reappraisal. <em>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2009;67(7):1446-1452. doi:10.1016/J.JOMS.2008.12.052
19. Osborn TM, Helal D, Mehra P. Iliac crest bone grafting for mandibular reconstruction: 10-year experience outcomes. <em>J Oral Biol Craniofac Res</em>. 2018;8(1):25-29.
20. Paganini A, H&ouml;rfelt C, Mark H. Gender differences in surgical treatment of patients with cleft lip and palate. <em>J Plast Surg Hand Surg</em>. 2018;52(2):106-110. doi:10.1080/2000656X.2017.1348951
21. Ural &Ccedil;, Bereket C, Sener &Yacute;, Aktan AM, Akpinar YZ. Bone height measurement of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients. J Clin Exp Dent. 2011;3(1):5-9.
22. Yu B, Wang CY. Osteoporosis and periodontal diseases-an update on their association and mechanistic links. <em>Periodontol 2000</em>. 2022;89(1):99-113. doi:10.1111/PRD.12422
23. Tache A, Mommaerts MY. Pain management at iliac donor sites after grafting of alveolar clefts. <em>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2022; 51(1):62-69. doi:10.1016/J.IJOM.2021.05.004
24. Milinkovic I, Cordaro L. Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review. <em>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2014; 43(5):606-625. doi:10.1016/J.IJOM.2013.12.004
25. van der Meij EH, Blankestijn J, Berns RM, et al. The combined use of two endosteal implants and iliac crest onlay grafts in the severely atrophic mandible by a modified surgical approach. <em>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2005;34(2):152-157. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2004.05.007
26. Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, Califano L, Santoro A, Sbordone L. Volume changes of iliac crest autogenous bone grafts after vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation of atrophic maxillas and mandibles: a 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up. <em>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2012;70(11):2559-2565. doi: 10.1016/J.JOMS.2012.07.040
27. McGrath CJR, Schepers SHW, Blijdorp PA, Hoppenreijs TJM, Erbe M. Simultaneous placement of endosteal implants and mandibular onlay grafting for treatment of the atrophic mandible: A preliminary report. <em>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 1996; 25(3):184-188. doi:10.1016/S0901-5027(96)80026-9
28. Pikos MA. Mandibular block autografts for alveolar ridge augmentation. <em>Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin</em>. 2005;13(2):91-107. doi:10.1016/J.CXOM.2005.05.003
29. Reinert S, K&ouml;nig S, Bremerich A, Eufinger H, Krimmel M. Stability of bone grafting and placement of implants in the severely atrophic maxilla. <em>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2003;41(4): 249-255. doi:10.1016/S0266-4356(03)00078-0
30. August M, Tompach P, Chang YC, Kaban L. Factors influencing the long-term outcome of mandibular reconstruction. <em>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</em>. 2000;58(7):731-737. doi:10.1053/JOMS.2000. 7255
Article available in :
Volume 7, Issue 4, 2024
Page : 371-377
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1487467
Article Information
Received : 21 May 2024
Accepted : 05 Haz 2024
Published : 30 Tem 2024
Corresponding Author :

Cemil Eren: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

[email protected]
Citation : Kaba YN, Demirbaş AE, Eren C, Soylu E, Bilge S, Alkan A. Evaluation of the success of anterior iliac crest harvested bone graft in reconstruction of different jaw defects: a retrospective study. J Health Sci Med. 2024;7(4):371-377.

Read: 140
Cited: 0
Download : 75
_Footer