JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos related to hallux rigidus
Aims: This study aims to evaluate the scientific accuracy, informational value, and content quality of YouTube videos about hallux rigidus, marking the first study to assess videos on this topic.
Methods: Two systematic searches were conducted by two orthopedic surgeons using the YouTube search bar with the keywords “hallux rigidus” and “hallux limitus.” Each video was evaluated based on the following features: title, content, source, duration (seconds), number of views, number of days since upload, view ratio (views/time since upload), number of likes, number of dislikes, like ratio (likes×100/likes+dislikes), and Video Power Index (VPI).
Results: A total of 50 videos meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Among these, 39 (78%) were uploaded by healthcare professionals. Despite this, 25 videos (50%) were categorized as low quality according to the DISCERN score, and 33 videos (66%) were classified as low quality based on the YouTube hallux rigidus score. The DISCERN and JAMA scores demonstrated a statistically significant relationship with the video source (p<0.001). Videos created by physicians had significantly higher DISCERN and JAMA scores compared to those created by non-physician healthcare professionals (p=0.015, p=0.01). Similarly, videos by non-physician healthcare professionals scored significantly higher than those prepared by patients or for advertisement purposes (p=0.031, p=0.026). Additionally, videos uploaded more than three years ago had a significantly higher like rate compared to more recent videos (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The use of platforms such as YouTube for health-related information is increasing. However, the overall quality of videos about hallux rigidus remains low, underscoring the need for higher-quality content to better support public health outcomes.


1. Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public&rsquo;s response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82469. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082469
2. Erdem H, Sisik A. The reliability of bariatric surgery videos in YouTube platform. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):712-716. doi:10.1007/s11695-017-2911-3
3. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS. Hallux rigidus: demographics, etiology, and radiographic assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(10):731-743. doi:10. 1177/107110070302401002
4. Yee G, Lau J. Current concepts review: hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(6):637-646. doi:10.3113/FAI.2008.0637
5. Ho B, Baumhauer J. Hallux rigidus. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(1):13-20. doi:10.1302/2058-5241.2.160031
6. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-194. doi:10.1177/1460458213512220
7. &Ouml;zdemir V, Hekim N. Birth of industry 5.0: making sense of big data with artificial intelligence, &ldquo;the internet of things&rdquo; and next-generation technology policy. OMICS. 2018;22(1):65-76. doi:10.1089/omi.2017.0194
8. Orkin AM, Gill PJ, Ghersi D, et al. Guidelines for reporting trial protocols and completed trials modified due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other extenuating circumstances: the CONSERVE 2021 statement. JAMA. 2021;326(3):257-265. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.9941
9. Uzun M, Cingoz T, Duran ME, Varol A, Celik H. The videos on YouTube&reg; related to hallux valgus surgery have insufficient information. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;28(4):414-417. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.009
10. Tekin SB, Bozgeyik B. Quality and content analysis of hallux valgus videos on YouTube&reg;. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023;62(1):85-90. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.003
11. Cengiz T, Şimşek ŞA, Ersoy A, Coşkun HS, Pişkin A. Assessment of YouTube videos on frozen shoulder: a quality analysis using DISCERN and JAMA scoring systems. Acta Med Alanya. 2024;8(1):15-19. doi:10. 30565/medalanya.1417889
12. Bruce-Brand RA, Baker JF, Byrne DP, Hogan NA, McCarthy T. Assessment of the quality and content of information on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the internet. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(6):1095-1100. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.007
13. Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, et al. YouTube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019;1(2):e109-e114. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2019.09.003
14. Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on rotator cuff tears. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e6852. doi:10.7759/cureus.6852
15. Wong M, Desai B, Bautista M, Kwon O, Kolodychuk N, Chimento G. YouTube is a poor source of patient information for knee arthroplasty and knee osteoarthritis. Arthroplast Today. 2018;5(1):78-82. doi:10.1016/ j.artd.2018.09.010
16. Gokcen HB, Gumussuyu G. A quality analysis of disc herniation videos on YouTube. World Neurosurg. 2019;124:e799-e804. doi:10.1016/j.wneu. 2019.01.146
17. MacLeod MG, Hoppe DJ, Simunovic N, Bhandari M, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR. YouTube as an information source for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review of video content. Arthroscopy. 2015; 31(1):136-142. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.06.009
Volume 8, Issue 2, 2025
Page : 228-231
_Footer