1. Chen AM, Ekambaram M, Li KC, Cooper PR, Mei ML. A scoping review of the influence of clinical contaminants on bond strength in direct adhesive restorative procedures. J Dent. 2024;145:104985. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104985
2. Niyomsujarit N, Uttamang P, Burad M, Sipiyaruk N, Sipiyaruk K. The effect of dentin contamination by topical anesthetics on micro-shear bond strength: an ın vitro experiment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(24):16567. doi:10.3390/ijerph192416567
3. Shirani F, Birang R, Ahmadpour E, et al. Evaluation of microleakage in resin composites bonded to an er:yag laser and bur-prepared root and coronal dentin using different bonding agents. J Lasers Med Sci. 2021;12: e74. doi:10.34172/jlms.2021.74
4. Bourgi R, Kharouf N, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Haikel Y, Hardan LA. Literature review of adhesive systems in dentistry: key components and their clinical applications. Applied Sciences 2024;14(18):8111. doi:10.3390/app14188111
5. Piemjai M, Lerttriphob T, Jariyapayuklert C, Garcia-Godoy F. A method to bond vital dentin with a microleakage-free hybrid layer. J Adhes Dent. 2025;27:43-51. doi:10.3290/j.jad.c_1953
6. Saikaew P, Sattabanasuk V, Harnirattisai C, Chowdhury AFMA, Carvalho R, Sano H. Role of the smear layer in adhesive dentistry and the clinical applications to improve bonding performance. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022;58:59-66. doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.12.001
7. Popescu M, Mali?a M, Vorovenci A, et al. Wet vs. dry dentin bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adhesive performance and hybrid layer integrity. Oral. 2025;5(3):63. doi.org/10.3390/oral5030063
8. Perdigão J. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1)dentin adhesion-not there yet. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020;56(1):190-207. doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004
9. Sahadi BO, Sebold M, André CB, et al. Effect of experimental dentin etchants on dentin bond strength, metalloproteinase inhibition, and antibiofilm activity. Dent Mater. 2024;40(4):e12-e23. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2024.02.017
10. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1-16. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016
11. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215-235.
12. de Siqueira FSF, Pinto TF, Carvalho EM, et al. Influence of dentinal moisture on the properties of universal adhesives. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2020;101:102633. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh. 2020.102633
13. Perdigao J, Swift E, Walter R. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion; London: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2014.
14. Wiyono H, Meidyawati R, Putranto AW. Penetration of universal adhesive system after smear layer removal on dentin using solution. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2024;18:1. doi: 10.2174/01187421063128882408060 72708
15. Sancaklı HS, Yildiz E, Bayrak I, Ozel S. Effect of different adhesive strategies on the post-operative sensitivity of class I composite restorations. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(1):15-22. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.126234
16. Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):72-86. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011
17. Hamama HH, Burrow MF, Yiu C. Effect of dentine conditioning on adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer adhesives. Aust Dent J. 2014; 59(2):193-200. doi:10.1111/adj.12169
18. Jacques P, Hebling J. Effect of dentin conditioners on the microtensile bond strength of a conventional and a self-etching primer adhesive system. Dent Mater. 2005;21(2):103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.12.004
19. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A Review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7(3):16. doi:10.3390/jfb7030016
20. Luque-Martinez IV, Muñoz MA, Hass V, Sutil E, Reis A, Loguercio AD. EDTA conditioning ıncreases the long-term microtensile bond strength to sclerotic dentin mediated by self-etch adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(5):397-403. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a41358
21. Sanon K, Elseoudy N, Hiraishi N, et al. Hypochlorous acid as a potential cavity conditioner for caries-affected dentin. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):21438. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-06191-7
22. Wiyono H, Meidyawati R, Putranto AW. Penetration of universal adhesive system after smear layer removal on dentin using tamarindus indica solution. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2024;18(1).
23. Aljifan MK, Alshehri AM, Alharbi RM, et al. An overview of dentin conditioning and its effect on bond strength. Int. J. Community Med. Public Health. 2023;10(1). doi:10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20223315
24. Mancuso E, Durso D, Mazzitelli C, et al. Glutaraldehyde-based desensitizers' influence on bonding performances and dentin enzymatic activity of universal adhesives. J Dent. 2023;136:104643. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104643
25. Sayed ME. The effect of dentine desensitizing agents on the retention of cemented fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(3):515. doi:10.3390/medicina59030515
26. Abd Nassar A, El-Sayed, HY, Etman WM. Effect of different desensitizing adhesive systems on the shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin surface. Tanta Dental Journal. 2016;13(2):109-117. doi:10.4103/ 1687-8574.188913
27. Osmari D, de Oliveira Ferreira AC, de Carlo Bello M, et al. Micromorphological evaluation of dentin treated with different desensitizing agents. J Lasers Med Sci. 2013;4(3):140-146.
28. Abbassy MA, Masoud AI, Alsulaimani FF, Bakry AS. Effect of citric acid erosion on enamel and dentin and possible protection by a novel bioactive borate adhesive system. J Dent. 2022;124:104208. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104208
29. Wang X, Yamauchi S, Sun J. Improve dentin bonding performance using a hydrolytically stable, ether-based primer. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13(3):128. doi:10.3390/jfb13030128
30. Halkai R, Vidyananda, Halkai KR. Effect of newer all-in-one irrigants on root dentin wettability and surface roughness-an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025;28(8):790-794. doi:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_ 364_25
31. Halkai R, Ishaq SS, Halkai KR. Effect of newer irrigating solution triton on the root dentinal surface roughness and microhardness: an in vitro study. Endodontology. 2025;10:4103. doi:10.4103/endo.endo_18_25
32. Wakas Oraim H, Al-Zaka IM. Effectiveness of triton ırrigation solution in smear layer removal: an in-vitro study. Eur Endod J. 2024;9(2):139-145. doi:10.14744/eej.2023.58070
33. Sheng X, Yu J, Liu H, Wang Z, Deng S, Shen Y. Dual effectiveness of a novel all-in-one endodontic irrigating solution in antibiofilm activity and smear layer removal. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1254927. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1254927
34. Şahin Mantı A, Helvacıoğlu Kıvanç B. Evaluation of the effect of chitosan-based irrigation solutions on the bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate to bulk-fill composite. J Funct Biomater. 2024;15(12). doi:10.3390/jfb15120370
35. Wakas Oraim H, Al-Zaka IM. Effectiveness of triton irrigation solution in smear layer removal: an in-vitro study. Eur Endod J. 2024;9(2):139-145. doi:10.14744/eej.2023.58070
36. Sebold M, André CB, Ambrosano GMB, Nascimento FD, Giannini M. Bond strength and adhesive interface analysis using EDTA as a dentin conditioner. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2017;77: 157-163. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.05.006
37. Ghavami-Lahiji M, Firouzmanesh M, Bagheri H, Jafarzadeh Kashi TS, Razazpour F, Behroozibakhsh M. The effect of thermocycling on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of a microhybrid dental resin composite. Restor Dent Endod. 2018;43(2):e26. doi:10.5395/rde. 2018.43.e26
38. Pavan S, dos Santos PH, Berger S, Bedran-Russo AK. The effect of dentin pretreatment on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;104(4):258-264. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913 (10)60134-5
39. Voinot J, Bedez M. Pretreatments to bonding on enamel and dentin disorders: a systematic review. Evid Based Dent. 2024;25(4):215. doi:10. 1038/s41432-024-01037-z
40. Mushashe AM, Gonzaga CC, Cunha LF, Furuse AY, Moro A, Correr GM. Effect of enamel and dentin surface treatment on the self-adhesive resin cement bond strength. Braz Dent J. 2016;27(5):537-542. doi:10. 1590/0103-6440201600445
41. Mirotti G, Lutri MP, Kraemer ME, et al. Universal adhesives applied to deep dentin with different bonding treatments. Adhesivos universales aplicados a dentina profunda con diferentes tratamientos de unión. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2022;35(3):188-197. doi:10.54589/aol.35/3/188
42. Sato T, Takagaki T, Hatayama T, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Update on enamel bonding strategies. Frontiers in Dental Medicine. 2021;2:666379. doi:10. 3389/fdmed.2021.666379
43. Kiuru O, Sinervo J, Vähänikkilä H, Anttonen V, Tjäderhane L. MMP Inhibitors and dentin bonding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:9949699. doi:10.1155/2021/9949699
44. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, et al. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(4):299-309.
45. Breschi L, Maravic T, Cunha SR, et al. Dentin bonding systems: from dentin collagen structure to bond preservation and clinical applications. Dent Mater. 2018;34(1):78-96. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2017.11.005
46. Nakabayashi, N. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. The quality of hybridized dentin 1998. doi:10.18905/jodu.39.1_33
47. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res. 2000;79(6):1385-1391. doi:10.1177/00220345000790060601
48. Devaraj P. Longevity of two restorative materials in primary teeth (an in-vivo study). Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India), 2018.
49. Buchalla W, Attin T, Hellwig E. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins. J Clin Dent. 1996;7(4):81-84.
50. Hoshika S, De Munck J, Sano H, Sidhu SK, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of conditioning and aging on the bond strength and ınterfacial morphology of glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(2):141-146. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a33994
51. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83(6):454-458. doi:10.1177/154405910408300604
52. Elkaffas AA, Alshehri A, Alhalabi F, et al. Impact of a novel pretreatment on bond strength of universal adhesive to conventional and CAD/CAM resin composites: ın vitro study. J Funct Biomater. 2025;16(6):197. doi:10. 3390/jfb16060197
53. Moreno-Sánchez P L, Ramírez-Álvarez M, Ayala-Ham ADR, et al. Dental surface conditioning techniques to increase the micromechanical retention to fiberglass posts: a literature review. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(14):8083. doi:10.3390/app13148083
54. Perdigão J, May KN Jr, Wilder AD Jr, Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid layer. Oper Dent. 2000;25(3):186-194.
55. Comba L, Bradna P, Lencová E, Dušková J, Devana H. The effect of surface treatment and adhesive system on the durability of composite repairs. Dentistry. 2015;5(8):318.
56. Leme AA, Vidal CM, Hassan LS, Bedran-Russo AK. Potential role of surface wettability on the long-term stability of dentin bonds after surface biomodification. J Biomech. 2015;48(10):2067-2071. doi:10.1016/ j.jbiomech.2015.03.016
57. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, et al. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004;83(3):216-221. doi:10.1177/15440 5910408300306
58. Tjäderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, et al. Optimizing dentin bond durability: control of collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases and cysteine cathepsins. Dent Mater. 2013;29(1):116-135. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.004
59. Mazzoni A, Pashley DH, Nishitani Y, et al. Reactivation of inactivated endogenous proteolytic activities in phosphoric acid-etched dentine by etch-and-rinse adhesives. Biomaterials. 2006;27(25):4470-4476. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.040
60. Perdigão J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e24-e37. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.149