JHSM
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

eISSN: 2636-8579
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Submit Manuscript

Index
Original Article
Clinical impact of bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine on pain during tunneled catheter placement
Abstract
Aims: Numerous studies have reported the efficacy of bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine solutions in reducing injection pain. In our study, we aimed to examine the difference in injection pain scores between buffered and unbuffered lidocaine solutions during subcutaneous injection, perivascular injection, and injection along the tunnel line during the tunneling dialysis catheter placement procedure. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 101 patients who underwent tunneled central venous hemodialysis catheter placement between January 2023 and June 2024. Clinical data were obtained through retrospective review of patient medical records.The patients included in the study were divided into two groups based on the content of the local anesthetic solution used during the procedure. The first group (n=53) consisted of patients who received local anesthesia with a 1% lidocaine solution only, while the second group (n=48) consisted of patients who received a solution of 1% lidocaine buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate at a 9:1 ratio. Pain levels were recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS). Age, gender, and VAS scores were compared between groups. Results: The age range of the 101 patients included in the study was between 19 and 84 years, and there was no significant difference in the mean age between the two groups. The gender distribution also did not show any statistically significant differences. In the comparison of VAS scores, the subcutaneous, perivascular, and tunnel region VAS scores for patients in group 1 (unbuffered) were 4.7±1.3, 4.4±1.2, and 4.2±1.5, respectively, while those in group 2 (buffered) were 2.6±1.1, 2.9±1.4, and 3.1±1.2, respectively. The difference between the groups was significant for all three injection sites, with p-values of

Keywords : Buffered lidocaine, dialysis catheter, pain level

Download Article


1. Alam M, Worley B. Buffered lidocaine: the standard of care for cutaneous procedures. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):166-167. doi:10. 1016/j.jaad.2020.01.017
2. Golzari SE, Soleimanpour H, Mahmoodpoor A, Safari S, Ala A. Lidocaine and pain management in the emergency department: a review article. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4(1):e15444. doi:10.5812/aapm.15444
3. Burns CA, Ferris G, Feng C, Cooper JZ, Brown MD. Decreasing the pain of local anesthesia: a prospective, double-blind comparison of buffered, premixed 1% lidocaine with epinephrine versus 1% lidocaine freshly mixed with epinephrine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(1):128-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.06.043
4. Cepeda MS, Tzortzopoulou A, Thackrey M, Hudcova J, Arora Gandhi P, Schumann R. Adjusting the pH of lidocaine for reducing pain on injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(12):CD006581. doi:10.1002/ 14651858.CD006581.pub2
5. Welch MN, Czyz CN, Kalwerisky K, Holck DE, Mihora LD. Double-blind, bilateral pain comparison with simultaneous injection of 2% lidocaine versus buffered 2% lidocaine for periocular anesthesia. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(10):2048-2052. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.029
6. Hockett D, Kress L, Mac Donald R, Krenzischek DA, Maheshwari A. Effectiveness of buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia during liver biopsy. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2021;44(3):172-176. doi:10.1097/SGA.00000 00000000542
7. Vasan A, Baker JA, Shelby RA, Soo MSC. Impact of sodium bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine on patient pain during ımage-guided breast biopsy. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(9):1194-1201. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.026
8. Villavicencio JC, Kulkarni A, Luis C, et al. Sensation of pain using buffered lidocaine for infiltration before vulvar biopsy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(3):609-614. doi:10.1097/AOG. 0000000000003710
9. Culp WC Jr, Yousaf M, Lowry B, McCowan TC, Culp WC. Pain and efficacy of local anesthetics for central venous access. Local Reg Anesth. 2008;1:11-15. doi:10.2147/lra.s4337
10. Bartfield JM, Gennis P, Barbera J, Breuer B, Gallagher EJ. Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(12):1387-1389. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82603-4
11. Christoph RA, Buchanan L, Begalla K, Schwartz S. Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17(2):117-120. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2
12. Hanna MN, Elhassan A, Veloso PM, et al. Efficacy of bicarbonate in decreasing pain on intradermal injection of local anesthetics: a meta-analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(2):122-125. doi:10.1097/AAP.0b 013e31819a12a6
13. Brogan GX Jr, Giarrusso E, Hollander JE, Cassara G, Maranga MC, Thode HC. Comparison of plain, warmed, and buffered lidocaine for anesthesia of traumatic wounds. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;26(2):121-125. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70139-7
14. Guo J, Yin K, Roges R, Enciso R. Efficacy of sodium bicarbonate buffered versus non-buffered lidocaine with epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve block: a meta-analysis. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2018;18(3):129-142. doi:10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.3.129
15. Frank SG, Lalonde DH. How acidic is the lidocaine we are injecting, and how much bicarbonate should we add?. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(2):71-73. doi:10.1177/229255031202000207
16. Vent A, Surber C, Graf Johansen NT, et al. Buffered lidocaine 1%/epinephrine 1:100,000 with sodium bicarbonate (sodium hydrogen carbonate) in a 3:1 ratio is less painful than a 9:1 ratio: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):159-165. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.088
Article available in :
Volume 9, Issue 1, 2026
Page : 208-212
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1807620
Article Information
Received : 22 Eki 2025
Accepted : 30 Ara 2025
Published : 05 Oca 2026
Corresponding Author :

Nur Kara Oğuz: Department of Radiology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkiye

[email protected]
Citation : Bulut E, Kara Oğuz N. Clinical impact of bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine on pain during tunneled catheter placement. J Health Sci Med. 2026;9(1):208-212. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1807620

Read: 128
Download : 140
Cited: 0
_Footer