JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Prenatal diagnosis and outcomes of cloacal anomalies: a retrospective analysis of 21 cases
Aims: To evaluate prenatal ultrasonographic findings, diagnostic distribution, and pregnancy outcomes in fetuses diagnosed with cloacal anomalies and to correlate imaging features with disease severity and prognosis.
Methods: This retrospective study included 21 fetuses prenatally diagnosed with cloacal anomalies at a tertiary referral center. Maternal demographics, gestational age at diagnosis, prenatal ultrasonographic features, genetic testing results, associated anomalies, and pregnancy outcomes were reviewed. Cloacal anomalies were classified as persistent cloaca, cloacal dysgenesis, cloacal exstrophy, omphalocele-exstrophy-imperforate anus-spinal (OEIS) defects complex, or exstrophy-epispadias complex (EEC).
Results: The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 24.7 (±5.17) weeks. Persistent cloaca was the most common diagnosis (42.8%), followed by cloacal exstrophy (28.6%), cloacal dysgenesis (14.3%), OEIS defects complex complex (9.5%), and EEC (4.8%). The most frequent prenatal ultrasonographic findings were pyelectasis/hydronephrosis, a lower abdominal cystic mass, and absence of the anal dimple. Cloacal dysgenesis was associated with severe urinary tract obstruction, characterized by oligohydramnios, megacystis, and bilateral hydronephrosis. Termination of pregnancy was performed in 57.1% of cases, while 23.9% survived postoperatively and 19.0% resulted in postnatal death.
Conclusion: Prenatal ultrasonography plays a crucial role in identifying cloacal anomalies. Recognition of specific imaging patterns is essential for differentiating cloacal dysgenesis from other cloacal malformations, as severity strongly correlates with prognosis and pregnancy outcome.


1. Sadler TW. Langman’s Medical Embryology. 14th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
2. Thomas DFM. The embryology of persistent cloaca and urogenital sinus malformations. Asian J Androl. 2020;22(2):124-128. doi:10.4103/aja.aja_72_19
3. Wood RJ, Reck CA, Levitt MA. Cloacal malformations: anatomy, embryology, and management. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010;19(2):102-111.
4. Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG. The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology. 11th ed. Elsevier; 2020.
5. Levitt MA, Peña A. Cloacal malformations: lessons learned from 490 cases. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010;19(2):128-138. doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg. 2009.11.012
6. Warne S, Chitty LS, Wilcox DT. Prenatal diagnosis of cloacal anomalies. BJU Int. 2002;89(1):78-81.
7. Sahinoglu Z, Mulayim B, Ozden S, et al. The prenatal diagnosis of cloacal dysgenesis sequence in six cases: can the termination of pregnancy always be the first choice? Prenat Diagn. 2004;24(1):10-16. doi:10.1002/pd.768
8. Keppler-Noreuil KM, Conway KM, Shen D, Rhoads AJ, Carey JC, Romitti PA. Clinical and risk factor analysis of cloacal defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Am J Med Genet A. 2017; 173(11):2873-2885. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.38469
9. Pauli RM. Lower urinary tract obstruction sequences: embryology and clinical implications. Am J Med Genet. 1994;51(2):158-169.
10. Carey JC, Greenbaum B, Hall BD. The OEIS complex: omphalocele, exstrophy, imperforate anus, spinal defects. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1978;14(6B):253-263.
11. Ebert AK, Reutter H, Ludwig M, Rösch WH. The exstrophy-epispadias complex. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009;4:23. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-4-23
12. Hamper UM, Gearhart JP, Dahnert WF, Sheth S, Jeffs RD. Bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex: prostatic evaluation by transrectal ultrasonography. Prostate. 1991;19(2):133-140. doi:10.1002/pros.299 0190206
13. Gearhart JP, Jeffs RD. Exstrophy of the bladder, epispadias and other bladder anomalies. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED Jr, eds. Campbell’s Urology. 6th ed. Vol 2. WB Saunders; 1992:1772-1821.
14. Achiron R, Yagel S, Rotstein Z, et al. Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of cloacal anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2(2):91-96.
15. Chen CP, Liu FF, Jan SW, Chang PY, Lin YN, Lan CC. Ultrasound-guided fluid aspiration and prenatal diagnosis of duplicated hydrometrocolpos with uterus didelphys and septate vagina. Prenat Diagn. 1996;16(6):572-576. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199606)16:6<572::AID-PD913>3.0.CO;2-S
16. Odibo AO, Turner GW, Borgida AF, Rodis JF, Campbell WA. Late prenatal ultrasound features of hydrometrocolpos secondary to cloacal anomaly: case reports and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9(6):419-421. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09060419.x
17. Hill SJ, Hirsch JH. Sonographic detection of fetal hydrometrocolpos. J Ultrasound Med. 1985;4(6):323-325. doi:10.7863/jum.1985.4.6.323
18. Garel L, Dubois J, Grignon A, Filiatrault D, Van Vliet G. US of the pediatric female pelvis: a clinical perspective. Radiographics. 2001;21(6): 1393-1407. doi:10.1148/radiographics.21.6.g01nv041393
19. Hayashi S, Sago H, Kashima K, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal hydrometrocolpos secondary to a cloacal anomaly by magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(5):577-579. doi: 10.1002/uog.2584
20. Livingston JC, Elicevik M, Breech L, Crombleholme TM, Peña A, Levitt MA. Persistent cloaca: a 10-year review of prenatal diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(3):403-407. doi:10.7863/jum.2012.31.3.403
21. Peña A, Levitt MA, Hong A, Midulla P. Surgical management of cloacal malformations: a review of 339 patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(3):470-479. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.033
Volume 9, Issue 3, 2026
Page : 786-792
_Footer