JHSM

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Preanalytical sample rejection patterns and quality indicators in the central laboratory of a tertiary university hospital: a retrospective analysis according to clinical department and patient subgroups
Aims: Preanalytical errors remain the leading source of laboratory testing errors and may compromise analytical reliability, delay clinical decision-making, increase healthcare costs, and adversely affect patient safety. Continuous monitoring of sample rejection patterns is essential for identifying institution-specific weaknesses and improving laboratory quality management systems. This study aimed to evaluate the causes of preanalytical sample rejection in a tertiary university hospital laboratory and to investigate rejection patterns according to clinical department category, patient admission status, and patient age group. Methods: This retrospective study included all rejected samples recorded in the Laboratory Information System between January 1 and June 30, 2025. Rejected specimens were classified according to rejection reason, sample tube type, clinical department category, patient admission status (inpatient/outpatient), and patient age group (adult/pediatric). Major rejection causes were grouped into five categories: insufficient sample volume, clotted sample, unanalyzable coagulation sample, hemolyzed sample, and other causes. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test, with statistical significance defined as p


1. Lippi G. Unveiling the hidden clinical and economic impact of preanalytical errors. Turk J Biochem. 2025;50(3):331-338. doi:10.1515/tjb-2025-0196
2. Plebani M, Scott S, Simundic AM, et al. New insights in preanalytical quality. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025;63(9):1682-1692. doi:10.1515/cclm-2025-0478
3. Nordin N, Ab Rahim SN, Wan Omar WFA, et al. Preanalytical errors in clinical laboratory testing at a glance: source and control measures. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e57243. doi:10.7759/cureus.57243.
4. Simundic AM, Lippi G. Preanalytical phase-a continuous challenge for laboratory professionals. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(2):145-149. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.017
5. Plebani M. Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing. Clin Biochem Rev. 2012;33(3):85-88.
6. Kani V, Kannan K, Arumugam S, Sonti S. Preanalytical errors in hematology: insights from a tertiary care hospital. Cureus. 2024;16(9): e69641. doi:10.7759/cureus.69641
7. Kocaismail Z, Demircin EY, Oguz EF. The preanalytical error rates of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Central Laboratory. Clin Lab. 2025;71:9.
8. Iqbal MS, Tabassum A, Arbaeen AF, Qasem AH, Elshemi AG, Almasmoum H. Preanalytical errors in a hematology laboratory: an experience from a tertiary care center. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(4): 591. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13040591
9. Jeraiby MA. Preanalytical phase: evaluation of specimen rejection rates and reasons from different hospital units during Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Ann Afr Med. 2025;24(3):643-648.
10. Gajjar D, Agravatt A, Khubchandani A, Parchwani DN. Evaluation of laboratory performance in consideration with pre analytical and post analytical quality indicators. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2024;39(2):264-270. doi:10.1007/s12291-023-01146-0
11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Procedures for the Handling and Processing of Blood Specimens for Common Laboratory Tests. CLSI document GP44-A4. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010.
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Collection, Transport, and Processing of Blood Specimens for Testing Plasma-Based Coagulation Assays and Molecular Hemostasis Assays. CLSI document H21-A5. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.
13. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189:2022 Medical Laboratories-Requirements for Quality and Competence. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2022.
14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. GP41-ED7: Collection of Diagnostic Venous Blood Specimens. 7th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017.
15. Sarkar I, Sarkar KR. Pre-analytical errors in a high-volume Bangladeshi diagnostic centre: Prevalence, workload impact, and mitigation strategies. PLoS One. 2026;21(3):e0341908.
16. Getawa S, Aynalem M, Melku M, Adane T. Blood specimen rejection rate in clinical laboratory: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pract Lab Med. 2023;33:e00303. doi:10.1016/j.plabm.2023.e00303
17. Bowen RA, Remaley AT. Interferences from blood collection tube components on clinical chemistry assays. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014; 24(1):31-44. doi:10.11613/BM.2014.006
18. Berhan A, Sharew B, Almaw A, et al. Types and frequency of preanalytical errors occurring in the hematology laboratory at Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North Central, Ethiopia, 2025. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):7300. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-38458-y
19. Iqbal MS, Tabassum A, Arbaeen AF, Qasem AH, Elshemi AG, Almasmoum H. Preanalytical errors in a hematology laboratory: an experience from a tertiary care center. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(4):591. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13040591
20. Rooper LM, Carter J, Hargrove J, Hoffmann S, Riedel S. Targeting rejection: analysis of specimen acceptability and rejection, and framework for identifying interventions in a single tertiary healthcare facility. J Clin Lab Anal. 2017;31(3):e22060. doi:10.1002/jcla.22060
21. Mussa B, Passarella G, Marchese M, Defrancisco B. Strategies to address difficult venous access in blood sampling: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2026;62(3):604.
22. Corneanu LE, Petri? OR, Lionte C, et al. Peripheral venipuncture in pediatric patients: a mini-review of clinical practice and technological advances. J Clin Med. 2025;14:18.
23. Schnabl K, Chan MK, Gong Y, Adeli K. Closing the gaps in paediatric reference intervals: the CALIPER initiative. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29(3):89-96.
24. Mulatie Z, Ebrahim E, Alebachew M, et al. Assessment of clinical hematology laboratory performance using sigma metrics and associated factors in total testing process at the dessie comprehensive specialized hospital, northeast, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2026;9(3):e72063.
25. Iqbal MS, Tabassum A, Arbaeen AF, Qasem AH, Elshemi AG, Almasmoum H. Preanalytical errors in a hematology laboratory: an experience from a tertiary care center. Diagnostics. 2023;13(4):591. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13040591
26. Shin DH, Kim J, Uh Y, et al. Development of an integrated reporting system for verifying hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia in clinical chemistry results. Ann Lab Med. 2014;34(4):307-312. doi:10.3343/alm.2014.34.4.307
27. Ho CKM, Chen C, Setoh JWS, Yap WWT, Hawkins RCW. Optimization of hemolysis, icterus and lipemia interference thresholds for 35 clinical chemistry assays. Pract Lab Med. 2021;25:e00232. doi:10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00232
Volume 9, Issue 4, 2026
Page : 1090-1096
_Footer