1. Ceunen E, Vlaeyen JV, Diest IV. On the origin of interoception. Front Psychol 2016; 7: 1-17
2. Khalsa SS, Lapidus RC. Can interoception improve thepragmatic search for biomarkers in psychiatry? Front Psychol 2016; 7: 1-19
3. Mehling WE, Gopisetty V, Daubenmier J, Price CJ, Hecht FM, Stewart A. Body awareness: construct and self-report measures. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e5614.
4. Mehling WE, Price C, Daubenmier JJ, Acree M, Bartmess E, Stewart A. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e48230.
5. Kabat-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness (15th.). New York, NY: Random House 2008.
6. Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. https: //osher.ucsf.edu/maia.
7. Mehling WE, Acree M, Stewart A, Silas J, Jones A. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (MAIA 2). PLoS ONE 2018; 12: e0208034.
8. Akgul A. Statistical analysis methods for medical research “spss applications” . 3rd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Emek Ofset; 2005.
9. Pierce AG. Measurement. In: Talbot LA (editor). Principles and Practice of Nursing Research. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby Year Book; 1995.
10. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ## Vienna, Austria.2020 URL https: //www.R-project.org/.
11. Revelle W. Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, https: //CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version=1.
12. Rosseel Y . Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.
13. Sun CW, Pju K. Questionnaire translation and psychometric properties evaluation. SEGi University College 2009; 2: 45–51.
14. Holgado–Tello FP, Chacón–Moscoso S, Barbero–García I, et al. Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Qual Quant 2010; 441: 153.
15. Baranauskas M, Grabauskaite A, Griškova-Bulanova I. Psychometric characteristics of Lithuanian version of Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). Neurologijos seminarai 2016; 20: 202–6.
16. Valenzuela-Moguillansky C, Reyes-Reyes A. Psychometric properties of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA) in a Chilean population. Front Psychol 2015; 6: 120.
17. Fujino H. Further validation of the Japanese version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12: 530.
18. Wan-Suk Gim, Kyo-Lin Sim, Ok-Kyung Cho. Korean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (K-MAIA): Development and Validation. Korean J Stress Res 2016; 24: 177-90.
19. Fujino H. Further validation of the Japanese version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12: 530.
20. Wan-Suk Gim, Kyo-Lin Sim, Ok-Kyung Cho. Korean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (K-MAIA): Development and Validation. Korean J Stress Res 2016; 24: 177-90.
21. Shoji M, Mehling WE, Hautzinger M, Herbert BM. Investigating multidimensional interoceptive awareness in a Japanese Population: validation of the Japanese MAIA-J. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 1855.