JHSM
Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine

Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine (JHSM) is an unbiased, peer-reviewed, and open access international medical journal. The Journal publishes interesting clinical and experimental research conducted in all fields of medicine, interesting case reports, and clinical images, invited reviews, editorials, letters, comments, and related knowledge.

ISSN: Active
eISSN: 2636-8579
Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
EndNote Style

Submit Manuscript

Index
Original Article
Multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA 2): psychometric properties of the Turkish version
Abstract
Aim: Interoception, defined as the perception of internal bodily changes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the Turkish validity and reliability study of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 (MAIA 2) scale developed by William Mehling et al. (2018). Material and Method: The research is methodological. Research data was collected between April 2020 and May 2020 (n=400). Forward and backward translation were used to translate the MAIA 2 into Turkish. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to analyze the psychometrics of the MAIA 2 in a 70:30 split sample. Statistical analysis were done with R Project. Results: The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value (KMO=0.910) was acceptable, and there exists a significant correlation structure with Bartlett’s test of sphericity (?2=5134.120, p<0.001). We observed six factors with Horn’s Parallel analysis. The Cronbach Alphas of these six factors were acceptable (?>0.60). Standardized loadings were positive and >0.40 with significant results (p<0.05) (r=0.71, p<0.05). The RMSEA is nearly zero and SRMR is extremely low. Conclusion: As a result, the Turkish version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Scale (MAIA 2) developed by Mehling et al. and originally in English is valid and reliable according to our results.

Keywords : Body awareness, body-mind, interoceptive awareness, validity, reliability

Download Article


1. Ceunen E, Vlaeyen JV, Diest IV. On the origin of interoception. Front Psychol 2016; 7: 1-17
2. Khalsa SS, Lapidus RC. Can interoception improve thepragmatic search for biomarkers in psychiatry? Front Psychol 2016; 7: 1-19
3. Mehling WE, Gopisetty V, Daubenmier J, Price CJ, Hecht FM, Stewart A. Body awareness: construct and self-report measures. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e5614.
4. Mehling WE, Price C, Daubenmier JJ, Acree M, Bartmess E, Stewart A. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e48230.
5. Kabat-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness (15th.). New York, NY: Random House 2008.
6. Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. https: //osher.ucsf.edu/maia.
7. Mehling WE, Acree M, Stewart A, Silas J, Jones A. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (MAIA 2). PLoS ONE 2018; 12: e0208034.
8. Akgul A. Statistical analysis methods for medical research “spss applications” . 3rd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Emek Ofset; 2005.
9. Pierce AG. Measurement. In: Talbot LA (editor). Principles and Practice of Nursing Research. St. Louis, MO, USA: Mosby Year Book; 1995.
10. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ## Vienna, Austria.2020 URL https: //www.R-project.org/.
11. Revelle W. Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, https: //CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version=1.
12. Rosseel Y . Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.
13. Sun CW, Pju K. Questionnaire translation and psychometric properties evaluation. SEGi University College 2009; 2: 45–51.
14. Holgado–Tello FP, Chacón–Moscoso S, Barbero–García I, et al. Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Qual Quant 2010; 441: 153.
15. Baranauskas M, Grabauskaite A, Griškova-Bulanova I. Psychometric characteristics of Lithuanian version of Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA). Neurologijos seminarai 2016; 20: 202–6.
16. Valenzuela-Moguillansky C, Reyes-Reyes A. Psychometric properties of the multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA) in a Chilean population. Front Psychol 2015; 6: 120.
17. Fujino H. Further validation of the Japanese version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12: 530.
18. Wan-Suk Gim, Kyo-Lin Sim, Ok-Kyung Cho. Korean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (K-MAIA): Development and Validation. Korean J Stress Res 2016; 24: 177-90.
19. Fujino H. Further validation of the Japanese version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12: 530.
20. Wan-Suk Gim, Kyo-Lin Sim, Ok-Kyung Cho. Korean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (K-MAIA): Development and Validation. Korean J Stress Res 2016; 24: 177-90.
21. Shoji M, Mehling WE, Hautzinger M, Herbert BM. Investigating multidimensional interoceptive awareness in a Japanese Population: validation of the Japanese MAIA-J. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 1855.
Article available in :
Volume 4, Issue 2, 2021
Page : 132-136
https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.836361
Article Information
Received : 05 Ara 2020
Accepted : 27 Şub 2021
Published : 28 Mar 2021
Corresponding Author :

Saliha Özpınar: Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Antalya, Turkey

[email protected]
Citation : Özpınar S, Dünder E, Demir Y , Akyol M. Multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA 2): psychometric properties of the Turkish version. J Health Sci Med 2021; 4(2): 132-136.

Read: 52
Cited: 9
Download : 39
_Footer